File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Subgingival debridement efficacy of glycine powder air polishing

TitleSubgingival debridement efficacy of glycine powder air polishing
Authors
KeywordsBiofilms
Dental scaling
Periodontal disease
Periodontitis
Scaling
Subgingival
Issue Date2007
Citation
Journal of Periodontology, 2007, v. 78, n. 6, p. 1002-1010 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Glycine powder air polishing (GPAP) has been shown to be significantly more effective in reducing the subgingival cultivable microflora in shallow periodontal pockets compared to curets and is safe when applied directly to root surfaces. The purpose of this study was to assess the subgingival debridement efficacy of GPAP in periodontal pockets with various depths. Methods: In each of 60 patients with severe periodontitis, one tooth with a probing depth (PD) ≥6 mm was randomly assigned to one of the following interventions: GPAP performed in teeth instrumented 3 months earlier (I); GPAP performed in previously non-instrumented teeth (NI); or no treatment (control). GPAP was performed for 5 seconds per surface. After extraction, teeth were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue, and subgingival debridement efficacy was assessed. Results: Overall, median debridement depth was 2.00 mm in I teeth and 1.86 mm in NI teeth, and the median debrided root surface was 49.24% and 45.64%, respectively. In anatomic PDs (APDs) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65% to 80% and 60% to 75% in 1 and NI teeth, respectively; the corresponding values for debrided root surface were 60% to 70% and 50% to 60%. In control teeth, virtually all subgingival root surfaces were stained. Clinical PD measurements were a median of 1.05 mm deeper than APD. Conclusion: GPAP for 5 seconds per surface is effective in removing most of the subgingival biofilm in periodontal pockets with an APD ≤3 mm.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199910
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.844
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.070
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlemmig, Thomas Frank-
dc.contributor.authorHetzel, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorTopoll, Heinz H.-
dc.contributor.authorGerß, Joachim Werner Otto-
dc.contributor.authorHaeberlein, Ingo-
dc.contributor.authorPetersilka, Gregor J.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-26T23:10:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-26T23:10:54Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, 2007, v. 78, n. 6, p. 1002-1010-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199910-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Glycine powder air polishing (GPAP) has been shown to be significantly more effective in reducing the subgingival cultivable microflora in shallow periodontal pockets compared to curets and is safe when applied directly to root surfaces. The purpose of this study was to assess the subgingival debridement efficacy of GPAP in periodontal pockets with various depths. Methods: In each of 60 patients with severe periodontitis, one tooth with a probing depth (PD) ≥6 mm was randomly assigned to one of the following interventions: GPAP performed in teeth instrumented 3 months earlier (I); GPAP performed in previously non-instrumented teeth (NI); or no treatment (control). GPAP was performed for 5 seconds per surface. After extraction, teeth were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue, and subgingival debridement efficacy was assessed. Results: Overall, median debridement depth was 2.00 mm in I teeth and 1.86 mm in NI teeth, and the median debrided root surface was 49.24% and 45.64%, respectively. In anatomic PDs (APDs) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65% to 80% and 60% to 75% in 1 and NI teeth, respectively; the corresponding values for debrided root surface were 60% to 70% and 50% to 60%. In control teeth, virtually all subgingival root surfaces were stained. Clinical PD measurements were a median of 1.05 mm deeper than APD. Conclusion: GPAP for 5 seconds per surface is effective in removing most of the subgingival biofilm in periodontal pockets with an APD ≤3 mm.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.subjectBiofilms-
dc.subjectDental scaling-
dc.subjectPeriodontal disease-
dc.subjectPeriodontitis-
dc.subjectScaling-
dc.subjectSubgingival-
dc.titleSubgingival debridement efficacy of glycine powder air polishing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2007.060420-
dc.identifier.pmid17539712-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34347359494-
dc.identifier.volume78-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1002-
dc.identifier.epage1010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247229700006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats