File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: OHIP: A Review of its First 20 Years for OHIPPIES

TitleOHIP: A Review of its First 20 Years for OHIPPIES
Authors
KeywordsBehavioral science
Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Quality of life and Systematic review
Issue Date2014
PublisherSage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925
Citation
The 92nd General Session & Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 June 2014. In Journal of Dental Research, 2014, v. 93 n. Special issue B: abstract no. 183 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To systematically review all clinical, population and psychometric data on the use of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) since its development 20 years ago in 1994. Method: A systematic literature search was carried out using four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus) of publications from 1994 to 2014. Abstracts and articles that described the use of OHIP were considered by two independent readers using predefined exclusion criteria. Selected studies were grouped by category and reviewed. Result: An initial search identified 3262 papers, 1348 ‘potentially effective publications’ were screnned (Kappa >0.80) and 656 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria - ‘effective’ publications for the review (Kappa >0.80). OHIP has been translated into over 40 different languages and employed in over 60 different countries, but evidence of cross-cultural validation is scant. The validity and reliability of OHIP have been widely reported; and mostly, it performs well. Various short-form measures exist (at least eight), with OHIP-14 being the most common version employed (376 out of 656 studies); however, issues of content validity and responsiveness of OHIP-14 in certain contexts are evident. Increasingly, OHIP is being employed in prospective studies to assess outcomes from clinical interventions (176 of the 656 reports), but few studies have interpreted or measured ‘change’ that is meaningful for a clinical or population health prospective. Conclusion: OHIP is widely used globally and has generally performed well in terms of psychometrics, albeit that there are cross-cultural concerns. The use of the short-form OHIP-14 is particularly popular, but it may not be the most appropriate measure to use in some particular contexts. Increasingly, OHIP is being used in prospective studies; however, the challenge remains to interpret what ‘change’ in OHIP scores actually means, and to determine its value and use in routine clinical practice as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Happy Birthday OHIP!
DescriptionOral Presentation
Session: 50 Oral Health Related Quality of Life
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199323
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.602
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.714

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, CPJen_US
dc.contributor.authorBroder, HLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T01:13:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T01:13:37Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 92nd General Session & Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 June 2014. In Journal of Dental Research, 2014, v. 93 n. Special issue B: abstract no. 183en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199323-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation-
dc.descriptionSession: 50 Oral Health Related Quality of Life-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To systematically review all clinical, population and psychometric data on the use of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) since its development 20 years ago in 1994. Method: A systematic literature search was carried out using four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus) of publications from 1994 to 2014. Abstracts and articles that described the use of OHIP were considered by two independent readers using predefined exclusion criteria. Selected studies were grouped by category and reviewed. Result: An initial search identified 3262 papers, 1348 ‘potentially effective publications’ were screnned (Kappa >0.80) and 656 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria - ‘effective’ publications for the review (Kappa >0.80). OHIP has been translated into over 40 different languages and employed in over 60 different countries, but evidence of cross-cultural validation is scant. The validity and reliability of OHIP have been widely reported; and mostly, it performs well. Various short-form measures exist (at least eight), with OHIP-14 being the most common version employed (376 out of 656 studies); however, issues of content validity and responsiveness of OHIP-14 in certain contexts are evident. Increasingly, OHIP is being employed in prospective studies to assess outcomes from clinical interventions (176 of the 656 reports), but few studies have interpreted or measured ‘change’ that is meaningful for a clinical or population health prospective. Conclusion: OHIP is widely used globally and has generally performed well in terms of psychometrics, albeit that there are cross-cultural concerns. The use of the short-form OHIP-14 is particularly popular, but it may not be the most appropriate measure to use in some particular contexts. Increasingly, OHIP is being used in prospective studies; however, the challenge remains to interpret what ‘change’ in OHIP scores actually means, and to determine its value and use in routine clinical practice as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Happy Birthday OHIP!-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Researchen_US
dc.rightsJournal of Dental Research. Copyright © Sage Publications, Inc.-
dc.subjectBehavioral science-
dc.subjectBiostatistics-
dc.subjectEpidemiology-
dc.subjectQuality of life and Systematic review-
dc.titleOHIP: A Review of its First 20 Years for OHIPPIESen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, CPJ: mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, CPJ=rp00037en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros231057en_US
dc.identifier.volume93en_US
dc.identifier.issueSpecial issue B: abstract no. 183en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats