File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Unreasonable Refusal to Mediate: The Need for a Principled Approach - PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd

TitleUnreasonable Refusal to Mediate: The Need for a Principled Approach - PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd
Authors
KeywordsAlternative dispute resolution
Business tenancies
Costs
Refusal
Mediation
Issue Date2014
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.
Citation
Civil Justice Quarterly, 2014, v. 33 n. 3, p. 261-265 How to Cite?
AbstractComments on the Court of Appeal ruling in PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd on whether a business tenant that breached its repair covenant should be required to pay the landlord's costs on the grounds that it had refused to acknowledge the latter's invitations to take part in mediation. Details the court's analysis of whether silence amounted to an unreasonable refusal to take part in alternative dispute resolution, which justified a costs penalty, and its grounds for extending the non-exhaustive factors to consider under the principles established in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/197600
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoo, AKCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-29T08:29:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-29T08:29:32Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationCivil Justice Quarterly, 2014, v. 33 n. 3, p. 261-265en_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-9261-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/197600-
dc.description.abstractComments on the Court of Appeal ruling in PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd on whether a business tenant that breached its repair covenant should be required to pay the landlord's costs on the grounds that it had refused to acknowledge the latter's invitations to take part in mediation. Details the court's analysis of whether silence amounted to an unreasonable refusal to take part in alternative dispute resolution, which justified a costs penalty, and its grounds for extending the non-exhaustive factors to consider under the principles established in Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.-
dc.relation.ispartofCivil Justice Quarterlyen_US
dc.subjectAlternative dispute resolution-
dc.subjectBusiness tenancies-
dc.subjectCosts-
dc.subjectRefusal-
dc.subjectMediation-
dc.titleUnreasonable Refusal to Mediate: The Need for a Principled Approach - PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailKoo, AKC: akckoo@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityKoo, AKC=rp01428en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros228758en_US
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage261-
dc.identifier.epage265-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.ssrn2446170-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2014/019-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats