File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: From ISDA to NAFMII: Insolvency Stalemate and PRC Bankruptcy Jurisprudence

TitleFrom ISDA to NAFMII: Insolvency Stalemate and PRC Bankruptcy Jurisprudence
Authors
Issue Date2013
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://cmlj.oxfordjournals.org
Citation
Capital Markets Law Journal, 2013, v. 8 n. 1, p. 77-89 How to Cite?
AbstractKey points: The standard form NAFMII Master Agreement is becoming the pre-eminent market standard contract used by the Chinese derivatives market to document OTC derivative transactions in China. Based on the ISDA Master Agreement, the NAFMII Master Agreement encounters identical insolvency stalemate difficulties when a counterparty goes insolvent. This article will explain the insolvency stalemate problem, and examine how the Chinese courts may address this stalemate problem. It concludes by considering how Chinese experience and jurisprudence on bankruptcy law may provide lessons for the future in resolving the ongoing 2008 global financial crisis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/196765
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOng, TW-
dc.contributor.authorHsiao, MWH-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-29T03:13:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-29T03:13:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationCapital Markets Law Journal, 2013, v. 8 n. 1, p. 77-89-
dc.identifier.issn1750-7219-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/196765-
dc.description.abstractKey points: The standard form NAFMII Master Agreement is becoming the pre-eminent market standard contract used by the Chinese derivatives market to document OTC derivative transactions in China. Based on the ISDA Master Agreement, the NAFMII Master Agreement encounters identical insolvency stalemate difficulties when a counterparty goes insolvent. This article will explain the insolvency stalemate problem, and examine how the Chinese courts may address this stalemate problem. It concludes by considering how Chinese experience and jurisprudence on bankruptcy law may provide lessons for the future in resolving the ongoing 2008 global financial crisis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://cmlj.oxfordjournals.org-
dc.relation.ispartofCapital Markets Law Journal-
dc.rightsPre-print: Journal Title] ©: [year] [owner as specified on the article] Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of xxxxxx]. All rights reserved. Pre-print (Once an article is published, preprint notice should be amended to): This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Article as published in the print edition of the Journal.] Post-print: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here].-
dc.titleFrom ISDA to NAFMII: Insolvency Stalemate and PRC Bankruptcy Jurisprudenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cmlj/kms047-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage77-
dc.identifier.epage89-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats