File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy trials in operable and locally advanced lung cancer: A re-analysis of meta-analyses of individual patients' data

TitleSurrogate endpoints for overall survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy trials in operable and locally advanced lung cancer: A re-analysis of meta-analyses of individual patients' data
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
The Lancet Oncology, 2013, v. 14 n. 7, p. 619-626 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The gold standard endpoint in clinical trials of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for lung cancer is overall survival. Although reliable and simple to measure, this endpoint takes years to observe. Surrogate endpoints that would enable earlier assessments of treatment effects would be useful. We assessed the correlations between potential surrogate endpoints and overall survival at individual and trial levels. Methods: We analysed individual patients' data from 15 071 patients involved in 60 randomised clinical trials that were assessed in six meta-analyses. Two meta-analyses were of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, three were of sequential or concurrent chemotherapy, and one was of modified radiotherapy in locally advanced lung cancer. We investigated disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to local or distant relapse or death, and locoregional control, defined as the time to the first local event, as potential surrogate endpoints. At the individual level we calculated the squared correlations between distributions of these three endpoints and overall survival, and at the trial level we calculated the squared correlation between treatment effects for endpoints. Findings: In trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, correlations between DFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2=0·83, 95% CI 0·83-0·83 in trials without radiotherapy, and 0·87, 0·87-0·87 in trials with radiotherapy) and excellent at trial level (R2=0·92, 95% CI 0·88-0·95 in trials without radiotherapy and 0·99, 0·98-1·00 in trials with radiotherapy). In studies of locally advanced disease, correlations between PFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2 range 0·77-0·85, dependent on the regimen being assessed) and trial level (R2 range 0·89-0·97). In studies with data on locoregional control, individual-level correlations were good (ρ2=0·71, 95% CI 0·71-0·71 for concurrent chemotherapy and ρ2=0·61, 0·61-0·61 for modified vs standard radiotherapy) and trial-level correlations very good (R2=0·85, 95% CI 0·77-0·92 for concurrent chemotherapy and R2=0·95, 0·91-0·98 for modified vs standard radiotherapy). Interpretation: We found a high level of evidence that DFS is a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival in studies of adjuvant chemotherapy involving patients with non-small-cell lung cancers, and PFS in those of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancers. Extrapolation to targeted agents, however, is not automatically warranted. Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, British Medical Research Council, Sanofi-Aventis. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/194395
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 26.509
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 13.940
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMauguen, A-
dc.contributor.authorPignon, J-P-
dc.contributor.authorBurdett, S-
dc.contributor.authorDomerg, C-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, D-
dc.contributor.authorPaulus, R-
dc.contributor.authorMandrekar, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorBelani, CP-
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, FA-
dc.contributor.authorEisen, T-
dc.contributor.authorPang, H-
dc.contributor.authorCollette, L-
dc.contributor.authorSause, WT-
dc.contributor.authorDahlberg, SE-
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, J-
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, M-
dc.contributor.authorSchild, SE-
dc.contributor.authorParmar, M-
dc.contributor.authorTierney, JF-
dc.contributor.authorPechoux, CL-
dc.contributor.authorMichiels, S-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T03:32:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-30T03:32:32Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Oncology, 2013, v. 14 n. 7, p. 619-626-
dc.identifier.issn1470-2045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/194395-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The gold standard endpoint in clinical trials of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for lung cancer is overall survival. Although reliable and simple to measure, this endpoint takes years to observe. Surrogate endpoints that would enable earlier assessments of treatment effects would be useful. We assessed the correlations between potential surrogate endpoints and overall survival at individual and trial levels. Methods: We analysed individual patients' data from 15 071 patients involved in 60 randomised clinical trials that were assessed in six meta-analyses. Two meta-analyses were of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, three were of sequential or concurrent chemotherapy, and one was of modified radiotherapy in locally advanced lung cancer. We investigated disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to local or distant relapse or death, and locoregional control, defined as the time to the first local event, as potential surrogate endpoints. At the individual level we calculated the squared correlations between distributions of these three endpoints and overall survival, and at the trial level we calculated the squared correlation between treatment effects for endpoints. Findings: In trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, correlations between DFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2=0·83, 95% CI 0·83-0·83 in trials without radiotherapy, and 0·87, 0·87-0·87 in trials with radiotherapy) and excellent at trial level (R2=0·92, 95% CI 0·88-0·95 in trials without radiotherapy and 0·99, 0·98-1·00 in trials with radiotherapy). In studies of locally advanced disease, correlations between PFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2 range 0·77-0·85, dependent on the regimen being assessed) and trial level (R2 range 0·89-0·97). In studies with data on locoregional control, individual-level correlations were good (ρ2=0·71, 95% CI 0·71-0·71 for concurrent chemotherapy and ρ2=0·61, 0·61-0·61 for modified vs standard radiotherapy) and trial-level correlations very good (R2=0·85, 95% CI 0·77-0·92 for concurrent chemotherapy and R2=0·95, 0·91-0·98 for modified vs standard radiotherapy). Interpretation: We found a high level of evidence that DFS is a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival in studies of adjuvant chemotherapy involving patients with non-small-cell lung cancers, and PFS in those of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancers. Extrapolation to targeted agents, however, is not automatically warranted. Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, British Medical Research Council, Sanofi-Aventis. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Oncology-
dc.titleSurrogate endpoints for overall survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy trials in operable and locally advanced lung cancer: A re-analysis of meta-analyses of individual patients' data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70158-X-
dc.identifier.pmid23680111-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84878348810-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage619-
dc.identifier.epage626-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000320371100048-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats