File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Pathological outcomes of Hong Kong Chinese patients with low risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy: comparison of six different protocols

TitlePathological outcomes of Hong Kong Chinese patients with low risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy: comparison of six different protocols
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/
Citation
Hong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 9 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To study the outcomes of local Chinese patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) undergoing radical prostatectomy using different AS protocols. Patients & Methods: From 1998 to 2012, 287 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Their pathological data were reviewed. Six different AS protocols were applied to the cohort with patients stratified in six different manners. Comparative analyses of the probabilities of missing unfavorable pathological outcomes were compared. Results: Extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, pathological T3 disease and upgrade of Gleason's score were present in 3.3%–17.2%, 1.6–3.4%, 3.3–19.2% and 20.6–34.5% respectively in the protocols. Protocol that considers PSA and Gleason score only had significantly higher rates of missing extracapsular extension and upgrading of pathological T stage. Conclusion: AS protocol based on PSA and Gleason's score alone may miss higher risk disease. Before widespread use of the various AS protocols, careful analysis of their performance in the local population is advised to minimize rate of missing unfavorable diseases.
DescriptionOral Presentation
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193963
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.387
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.009

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsang, CFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsu, HLJen_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, ATLen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, EMHen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, KLen_US
dc.contributor.authorYiu, MKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T06:38:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-28T06:38:22Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193963-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To study the outcomes of local Chinese patients eligible for active surveillance (AS) undergoing radical prostatectomy using different AS protocols. Patients & Methods: From 1998 to 2012, 287 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Their pathological data were reviewed. Six different AS protocols were applied to the cohort with patients stratified in six different manners. Comparative analyses of the probabilities of missing unfavorable pathological outcomes were compared. Results: Extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, pathological T3 disease and upgrade of Gleason's score were present in 3.3%–17.2%, 1.6–3.4%, 3.3–19.2% and 20.6–34.5% respectively in the protocols. Protocol that considers PSA and Gleason score only had significantly higher rates of missing extracapsular extension and upgrading of pathological T stage. Conclusion: AS protocol based on PSA and Gleason's score alone may miss higher risk disease. Before widespread use of the various AS protocols, careful analysis of their performance in the local population is advised to minimize rate of missing unfavorable diseases.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofBJU Internationalen_US
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com-
dc.titlePathological outcomes of Hong Kong Chinese patients with low risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy: comparison of six different protocolsen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailTsu, HLJ: jamestsu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailHo, KL: hkl218@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailYiu, MK: pmkyiu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.12606-
dc.identifier.hkuros227503en_US
dc.identifier.volume113-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. S1-
dc.identifier.spage9-
dc.identifier.epage9-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats