File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Zhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge

TitleZhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherUniversity of Hawaii Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.uhpress.hawaii.edu/journals/pew/index.html
Citation
Philosophy East and West, 2015, v. 65 n. 3, p. 892-917 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough the text of the Zhuangzi includes what appear to be skeptical arguments, there has been much debate as to the nature of its skeptical stance, and even whether or not it is substantively skeptical at all. An attempt is made here to engage with both the skeptical aspects of the text and its positive agenda, accepting that the Zhuangzi takes a substantive skeptical stance while also arguing that in doing so it provides a positive account of how to improve our epistemic position. The argument focuses on Zhuangist attitudes to different types of knowledge, specifically what the text refers to as 'lesser knowledge' (xiao zhi 小知) and 'greater knowledge' (da zhi 大知), and the relationship between the two. An attempt is made to show that the Zhuangist stance is that of a 'positive skeptic' who offers wide-ranging practical advice on how to improve our own epistemic situation, while at the same time warning us of the ultimate limits of what we can come to know.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/191845
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.233
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSturgeon, D-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-15T07:28:18Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-15T07:28:18Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophy East and West, 2015, v. 65 n. 3, p. 892-917-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8221-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/191845-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the text of the Zhuangzi includes what appear to be skeptical arguments, there has been much debate as to the nature of its skeptical stance, and even whether or not it is substantively skeptical at all. An attempt is made here to engage with both the skeptical aspects of the text and its positive agenda, accepting that the Zhuangzi takes a substantive skeptical stance while also arguing that in doing so it provides a positive account of how to improve our epistemic position. The argument focuses on Zhuangist attitudes to different types of knowledge, specifically what the text refers to as 'lesser knowledge' (xiao zhi 小知) and 'greater knowledge' (da zhi 大知), and the relationship between the two. An attempt is made to show that the Zhuangist stance is that of a 'positive skeptic' who offers wide-ranging practical advice on how to improve our own epistemic situation, while at the same time warning us of the ultimate limits of what we can come to know.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawaii Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.uhpress.hawaii.edu/journals/pew/index.html-
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy East and West-
dc.rightsPhilosophy East and West. Copyright © University of Hawaii Press.-
dc.titleZhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1353/pew.2015.0064-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84941108648-
dc.identifier.hkuros226240-
dc.identifier.volume65-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage892-
dc.identifier.epage917-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000369120700014-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0031-8221-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats