File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: One Country, Two EIA Systems: the public engagement in the EIA systems of Hong Kong and China

TitleOne Country, Two EIA Systems: the public engagement in the EIA systems of Hong Kong and China
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
The 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA13), Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-16 May 2013. In IAIA13 Conference Proceedings, 2013 How to Cite?
AbstractINTRODUCTION: The paper examines two distinctive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practices in the aspects of public engagement process applied in Hong Kong and China mainland. Under the “One Country, Two Systems” governance framework, Hong Kong enjoys high level of autonomy. Due to the unique historical background, the practices of environmental management between the two places are different. This paper uses the EIA of Shenzhen Western Corridor project, a trans-boundary EIA (TEIA) between Hong Kong and Shenzhen, to compare and contrast the institutional setting of EIA system in Hong Kong and China mainland in terms of public engagement process. The paper ends with a disc…
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190773

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, CNen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, CCCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-17T15:41:35Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-17T15:41:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA13), Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-16 May 2013. In IAIA13 Conference Proceedings, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190773-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The paper examines two distinctive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practices in the aspects of public engagement process applied in Hong Kong and China mainland. Under the “One Country, Two Systems” governance framework, Hong Kong enjoys high level of autonomy. Due to the unique historical background, the practices of environmental management between the two places are different. This paper uses the EIA of Shenzhen Western Corridor project, a trans-boundary EIA (TEIA) between Hong Kong and Shenzhen, to compare and contrast the institutional setting of EIA system in Hong Kong and China mainland in terms of public engagement process. The paper ends with a disc…-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIAIA13 Conference Proceedingsen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleOne Country, Two EIA Systems: the public engagement in the EIA systems of Hong Kong and Chinaen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailNg, CN: cnng@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityNg, CN=rp00606en_US
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros224759en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats