File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Bonding to caries-affected dentin: a systematic review

TitleBonding to caries-affected dentin: a systematic review
Authors
KeywordsBonding
Caries-affected dentin
Systematic review
Issue Date2013
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0960-7439
Citation
The 24th Congress of the International Association of Pediatric Dentistry, Seoul, Korea, 12-15 June 2013. In International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2013, v. 23 suppl. s1, p. 58, abstract P01-19 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: ‘Minimal invasive dentistry’ aims at preserving the firm, discoloured caries-affected dentin (CAD), which is remineralizable and free of bacteria. The research studies of dental adhesives are usually performed on sound dentin (SD), though CAD is the substrate commonly encountered for bonding in routine clinical practice. AIM: To systematically analyze the published literature on resindentin bonding to CAD substrate, in order to answer the question: ‘Does resin adhesive bonding to CAD produce weaker bonds when compared to SD?’ DESIGN: Electronic databases were searched to identify original studies that evaluated the bond achieved between adhesive resin and CAD by measuring their bond strength (BS). Full text articles in English language were only included. Further relevant articles from the reference list of the retrieved studies were accessed through further electronic and hand searches. Only articles that met the specific inclusion criteria were included in the review. RESULTS: Among the 34 studies included for this review, over 80% of them had used micro-tensile test for BS measurement, whilst <20% used micro-shear test method. Majority of the studies had tested the simplified etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives. Eighty-percent of them showed higher BS to SD compared to CAD and the remaining 20% of them showed no difference between these two substrates. Among the studies that used three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives, 40% showed higher and 60% showed no difference when BS was compared between SD and CAD. CONCLUSION: Simplified resin adhesives produce weaker bonds to caries-affected dentin than sound dentin.
DescriptionPoster Session P01 - Dental Materials: abstract P01-19
This journal suppl. is the Special Issue: Abstracts of the 24th Congress of the International Association of Pediatric Dentistry ... 2013
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/189667
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.303
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.721

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEkambaram, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorYiu, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, J-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-17T14:52:45Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-17T14:52:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 24th Congress of the International Association of Pediatric Dentistry, Seoul, Korea, 12-15 June 2013. In International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2013, v. 23 suppl. s1, p. 58, abstract P01-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-7439-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/189667-
dc.descriptionPoster Session P01 - Dental Materials: abstract P01-19-
dc.descriptionThis journal suppl. is the Special Issue: Abstracts of the 24th Congress of the International Association of Pediatric Dentistry ... 2013-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: ‘Minimal invasive dentistry’ aims at preserving the firm, discoloured caries-affected dentin (CAD), which is remineralizable and free of bacteria. The research studies of dental adhesives are usually performed on sound dentin (SD), though CAD is the substrate commonly encountered for bonding in routine clinical practice. AIM: To systematically analyze the published literature on resindentin bonding to CAD substrate, in order to answer the question: ‘Does resin adhesive bonding to CAD produce weaker bonds when compared to SD?’ DESIGN: Electronic databases were searched to identify original studies that evaluated the bond achieved between adhesive resin and CAD by measuring their bond strength (BS). Full text articles in English language were only included. Further relevant articles from the reference list of the retrieved studies were accessed through further electronic and hand searches. Only articles that met the specific inclusion criteria were included in the review. RESULTS: Among the 34 studies included for this review, over 80% of them had used micro-tensile test for BS measurement, whilst <20% used micro-shear test method. Majority of the studies had tested the simplified etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives. Eighty-percent of them showed higher BS to SD compared to CAD and the remaining 20% of them showed no difference between these two substrates. Among the studies that used three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives, 40% showed higher and 60% showed no difference when BS was compared between SD and CAD. CONCLUSION: Simplified resin adhesives produce weaker bonds to caries-affected dentin than sound dentin.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0960-7439-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistryen_US
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com-
dc.subjectBonding-
dc.subjectCaries-affected dentin-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.titleBonding to caries-affected dentin: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailYiu, C: ckyyiu@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, J: jpmat@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYiu, C=rp00018en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ipd.12037-
dc.identifier.hkuros224563en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros243143-
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issuesuppl. s1en_US
dc.identifier.spage58, abstract P01-19en_US
dc.identifier.epage58, abstract P01-19en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.customcontrol.immutablesml 131104; 150518-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats