File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Free choice of learning management systems: Do student habits override inherent system quality?

TitleFree choice of learning management systems: Do student habits override inherent system quality?
Authors
KeywordsLearning management system
LMS
CMS
Moodle
WebCT
Interface
Learning
Students
Issue Date2013
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/itse/itse.jsp
Citation
Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2013, v. 10 n. 2, p. 84-94 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose – Although multiple studies examine institutional transitions of learning management systems (LMS) or compare their merits, studies examining students' free choice of access on parallel LMSs for the same course are absent from the literature. In order to investigate usage in a free‐choice situation, identical content was posted at the same time to two different LMSs in a large enrollment class with a diversity of majors. Design/methodology/approach – Two prevalent LMSs were utilized in the study: WebCT, which was in existence at a university‐wide level previously, and Moodle, which will become the new university‐wide system in the 2012‐13 academic year onwards. Both student self‐reports and LMS log usage data were analyzed. LMS preferences and usage groups were categorized. Findings – Although this inquiry revealed that most students chose to use the WebCT system (85 per cent WebCT users, 15 per cent Moodle users; both self‐reported and log‐verified), the reasons given for WebCT preference pertained largely to habit and that most other courses are using the WebCT LMS. In contrast, the reasons given for using Moodle spoke directly to the attributes of the LMS itself, namely the interface quality and the way it is organized. Originality/value – This study indicates that institutions should look beyond student usage patterns in making LMS choices, and that LMS quality is sometimes, and perhaps unfortunately, overshadowed by student habit and familiarity.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/188170
ISSN
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.112

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPorter, GW-
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-21T07:40:10Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-21T07:40:10Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInteractive Technology and Smart Education, 2013, v. 10 n. 2, p. 84-94-
dc.identifier.issn1741-5659-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/188170-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Although multiple studies examine institutional transitions of learning management systems (LMS) or compare their merits, studies examining students' free choice of access on parallel LMSs for the same course are absent from the literature. In order to investigate usage in a free‐choice situation, identical content was posted at the same time to two different LMSs in a large enrollment class with a diversity of majors. Design/methodology/approach – Two prevalent LMSs were utilized in the study: WebCT, which was in existence at a university‐wide level previously, and Moodle, which will become the new university‐wide system in the 2012‐13 academic year onwards. Both student self‐reports and LMS log usage data were analyzed. LMS preferences and usage groups were categorized. Findings – Although this inquiry revealed that most students chose to use the WebCT system (85 per cent WebCT users, 15 per cent Moodle users; both self‐reported and log‐verified), the reasons given for WebCT preference pertained largely to habit and that most other courses are using the WebCT LMS. In contrast, the reasons given for using Moodle spoke directly to the attributes of the LMS itself, namely the interface quality and the way it is organized. Originality/value – This study indicates that institutions should look beyond student usage patterns in making LMS choices, and that LMS quality is sometimes, and perhaps unfortunately, overshadowed by student habit and familiarity.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/itse/itse.jsp-
dc.relation.ispartofInteractive Technology and Smart Education-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectLearning management system-
dc.subjectLMS-
dc.subjectCMS-
dc.subjectMoodle-
dc.subjectWebCT-
dc.subjectInterface-
dc.subjectLearning-
dc.subjectStudents-
dc.titleFree choice of learning management systems: Do student habits override inherent system quality?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailPorter, GW: porterg@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityPorter, GW=rp02099-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/ITSE-07-2012-0019-
dc.identifier.hkuros218366-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage84-
dc.identifier.epage94-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats