File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Ostracoda collected off southern Iceland during the Iceage Project

TitleOstracoda collected off southern Iceland during the Iceage Project
Authors
KeywordsSciences: comprehensive works
Issue Date2013
PublisherSocieta Siciliana di Scienze Naturali.
Citation
The 17th International Symposium on Ostracoda (ISO 17), Roma, Italy, 23-26 July 2013. In Il Naturalista Siciliano, 2013, v. 37 n. 1, p. 151-152 How to Cite?
AbstractThe IceAGE Project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology) aims to study the biodiversity (classical taxonomy, phylogeography and ecological modeling) in the climate sensitive region off Iceland (BRIX et al., 2012). The first IceAGE cruise was conducted in September 2011 and samples were collected from 241 stations in 31 working areas off Iceland (subpolar North Atlantic). Samples covered a depth range from the continental shelf to the bathyal zone. Our objective is to analyse ostracods from Epibenthic Sledge (EBS) and Multicorer (MUC) samples collected from the stations following an increasing depth off Southern Iceland. We aim to compare the diversity of Ostracoda assemblage at different depths, as well as difference between samples obtained by EBS and MUC. All specimens will be identified to species level and when necessary new species will be described. Furthermore, we will also compare environmental parameters with ostracod distribution pattern. Preliminary results show that the faunal composition differs between the deep sea (Area 1) and shelf (Area 9) areas. EBS and MUC collected samples show different species composition. The smaller taxa (e.g. Krithe) were more abundant in the MUC samples, while the larger taxa (Echinocythereis echinata) are more abundant in the EBS samples. This indicates that using both tools together provide a better picture of the ostracod species diversity.
DescriptionConference Theme: Back to the Future
Scientific Session - Ostracoda in palaeoceanographic reconstructions during the Cenozoic
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/187996
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrimm, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBrandao, SNen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuhara, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-21T07:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-21T07:24:43Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 17th International Symposium on Ostracoda (ISO 17), Roma, Italy, 23-26 July 2013. In Il Naturalista Siciliano, 2013, v. 37 n. 1, p. 151-152en_US
dc.identifier.issn0394-0063-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/187996-
dc.descriptionConference Theme: Back to the Future-
dc.descriptionScientific Session - Ostracoda in palaeoceanographic reconstructions during the Cenozoic-
dc.description.abstractThe IceAGE Project (Icelandic marine Animals: Genetics and Ecology) aims to study the biodiversity (classical taxonomy, phylogeography and ecological modeling) in the climate sensitive region off Iceland (BRIX et al., 2012). The first IceAGE cruise was conducted in September 2011 and samples were collected from 241 stations in 31 working areas off Iceland (subpolar North Atlantic). Samples covered a depth range from the continental shelf to the bathyal zone. Our objective is to analyse ostracods from Epibenthic Sledge (EBS) and Multicorer (MUC) samples collected from the stations following an increasing depth off Southern Iceland. We aim to compare the diversity of Ostracoda assemblage at different depths, as well as difference between samples obtained by EBS and MUC. All specimens will be identified to species level and when necessary new species will be described. Furthermore, we will also compare environmental parameters with ostracod distribution pattern. Preliminary results show that the faunal composition differs between the deep sea (Area 1) and shelf (Area 9) areas. EBS and MUC collected samples show different species composition. The smaller taxa (e.g. Krithe) were more abundant in the MUC samples, while the larger taxa (Echinocythereis echinata) are more abundant in the EBS samples. This indicates that using both tools together provide a better picture of the ostracod species diversity.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSocieta Siciliana di Scienze Naturali.-
dc.relation.ispartofIl Naturalista Sicilianoen_US
dc.subjectSciences: comprehensive works-
dc.titleOstracoda collected off southern Iceland during the Iceage Projecten_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailYasuhara, M: yasuhara@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityYasuhara, M=rp01474en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros219424en_US
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage151-
dc.identifier.epage152-
dc.publisher.placeItaly-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats