File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Restatement of the law on rectification: equitable relief for mistakes in contractual documents

TitleRestatement of the law on rectification: equitable relief for mistakes in contractual documents
Authors
KeywordsCommon mistake
Comparative law
Loan agreements
Rectification
Tomlin orders
Issue Date2014
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944
Citation
International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2014, v. 25 n. 1, p. 26-30 How to Cite?
AbstractSummarises the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment in Kowloon Development Finance Ltd v Pendex Industries Ltd on whether there was sufficient evidence to show that: (1) the parties to two Tomlin orders containing the renegotiated terms of a loan arrangement had been in common mistake for failing to include a term that the relevant debt was to be discharged; or (2) the mistake was solely on the lender's part and justified the rectification of the second Tomlin order. Assesses the current state of the law in Hong Kong and England and Wales on rectification for common or unilateral mistake.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/185923
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMason, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-20T11:46:38Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-20T11:46:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Company and Commercial Law Review, 2014, v. 25 n. 1, p. 26-30en_US
dc.identifier.issn0958-5214en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/185923-
dc.description.abstractSummarises the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment in Kowloon Development Finance Ltd v Pendex Industries Ltd on whether there was sufficient evidence to show that: (1) the parties to two Tomlin orders containing the renegotiated terms of a loan arrangement had been in common mistake for failing to include a term that the relevant debt was to be discharged; or (2) the mistake was solely on the lender's part and justified the rectification of the second Tomlin order. Assesses the current state of the law in Hong Kong and England and Wales on rectification for common or unilateral mistake.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Company and Commercial Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectCommon mistake-
dc.subjectComparative law-
dc.subjectLoan agreements-
dc.subjectRectification-
dc.subjectTomlin orders-
dc.titleRestatement of the law on rectification: equitable relief for mistakes in contractual documentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMason, L: masonlee@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMason, LC=rp01269en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros219398en_US
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage26-
dc.identifier.epage30-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats