File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bringing the State Back In: Restoring the role of the State in Chinese higher education

TitleBringing the State Back In: Restoring the role of the State in Chinese higher education
Authors
KeywordsChanging State-Market Relations
Educational Inequality
Privatisation And Marketisation Of Higher Education
Social Harmony
The Deprivatisation Of Education
Issue Date2012
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EJED
Citation
European Journal Of Education, 2012, v. 47 n. 2, p. 228-241 How to Cite?
AbstractIn the last few decades, in the wake of three major crises in political faith and the overall instability that followed the end of the Cultural Revolution, the post-Mao Chinese government has sought to improve the lives of its citizens and to restore political legitimacy through rapid economic growth that has focused almost exclusively on GDP. This strong focus has brought about rapid, widespread economic growth to China, and has, by classical market standards, been a success. At the same time, issues of social development and human well-being have received less attention. Before the Hu-Wen leadership's formal accession to power, the Jiang-Zhu administration sought to adopt neo-liberal ideas and practices to reform the delivery of social services and the implementation and funding of social policy. In this context, major fields of social policy such as health, education, and housing have been going through the processes of marketisation and privatisation, which have placed much of the financial burden of meeting these social welfare needs on China's citizens. After several decades of privatisation and marketisation in the educational system, the Chinese government has been the subject of repeated criticism for failing to tackle what is popularly known as the 'new three mountains phenomenon', namely, the rising cost of health, education, and housing in recent years. Against the wider policy context described above, this article examines the social and political consequences of the privatisation and marketisation of education. It also discusses the major policies and strategies recently adopted by the Chinese government to restore the role of the State in the education system in order to address the negative consequences of the privatisation of education. Finally, it critically examines the main implications of major reforms undertaken in higher education in Mainland China. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/179391
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.609
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.577
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMok, KHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T09:55:38Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-19T09:55:38Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal Of Education, 2012, v. 47 n. 2, p. 228-241en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-8211en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/179391-
dc.description.abstractIn the last few decades, in the wake of three major crises in political faith and the overall instability that followed the end of the Cultural Revolution, the post-Mao Chinese government has sought to improve the lives of its citizens and to restore political legitimacy through rapid economic growth that has focused almost exclusively on GDP. This strong focus has brought about rapid, widespread economic growth to China, and has, by classical market standards, been a success. At the same time, issues of social development and human well-being have received less attention. Before the Hu-Wen leadership's formal accession to power, the Jiang-Zhu administration sought to adopt neo-liberal ideas and practices to reform the delivery of social services and the implementation and funding of social policy. In this context, major fields of social policy such as health, education, and housing have been going through the processes of marketisation and privatisation, which have placed much of the financial burden of meeting these social welfare needs on China's citizens. After several decades of privatisation and marketisation in the educational system, the Chinese government has been the subject of repeated criticism for failing to tackle what is popularly known as the 'new three mountains phenomenon', namely, the rising cost of health, education, and housing in recent years. Against the wider policy context described above, this article examines the social and political consequences of the privatisation and marketisation of education. It also discusses the major policies and strategies recently adopted by the Chinese government to restore the role of the State in the education system in order to address the negative consequences of the privatisation of education. Finally, it critically examines the main implications of major reforms undertaken in higher education in Mainland China. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EJEDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Educationen_US
dc.subjectChanging State-Market Relationsen_US
dc.subjectEducational Inequalityen_US
dc.subjectPrivatisation And Marketisation Of Higher Educationen_US
dc.subjectSocial Harmonyen_US
dc.subjectThe Deprivatisation Of Educationen_US
dc.titleBringing the State Back In: Restoring the role of the State in Chinese higher educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMok, KH: ka-ho.mok@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMok, KH=rp00603en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1465-3435.2012.01520.xen_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84861380865en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861380865&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage228en_US
dc.identifier.epage241en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000304259400005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMok, KH=7103141165en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0141-8211-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats