File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberazation of the higher education market and changing governance in HongKong, Singapore and Malaysia

TitleVarieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberazation of the higher education market and changing governance in HongKong, Singapore and Malaysia
Authors
KeywordsAuthoritarian Liberalism
Higher Education Market
Market Accelerationist State
Regulatory Regime
Issue Date2008
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09512748.asp
Citation
Pacific Review, 2008, v. 21 n. 2, p. 147-170 How to Cite?
AbstractUnder intensified pressures for improving the global competence of university graduates, national governments across different parts of the globe have to on the one hand expand higher education enrolments and on the other hand assure high quality in teaching and research in order to make sure their higher education systems can compete globally. Many Asian states have been in the forefront of this effort to improve national competitiveness by raising their higher education enrolment rate. As state financing and provision alone will not satisfy the growing demands for higher education, governments in Asia adopt more pro-competition policy instruments and increasingly look to the market/ private sectors in running higher education. Therefore the private higher education sector has paid for much of the higher education sector expansion, leading to revolutionary changes and imparting a growing 'privateness' to Asian higher education systems. This article sets out in this wider socio-economic context to examine the rise of transnational higher education in three Asian societies: Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. With particular reference to examining how the growing prominence of privateness in higher education has challenged the conventional education governance models, this article critically examines how these Asian states have reinvented their regulatory regimes to govern the growing complexity and highly contested public-private mix in higher education.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/179373
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.074
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.770
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMok, KHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T09:55:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-19T09:55:33Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationPacific Review, 2008, v. 21 n. 2, p. 147-170en_US
dc.identifier.issn0951-2748en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/179373-
dc.description.abstractUnder intensified pressures for improving the global competence of university graduates, national governments across different parts of the globe have to on the one hand expand higher education enrolments and on the other hand assure high quality in teaching and research in order to make sure their higher education systems can compete globally. Many Asian states have been in the forefront of this effort to improve national competitiveness by raising their higher education enrolment rate. As state financing and provision alone will not satisfy the growing demands for higher education, governments in Asia adopt more pro-competition policy instruments and increasingly look to the market/ private sectors in running higher education. Therefore the private higher education sector has paid for much of the higher education sector expansion, leading to revolutionary changes and imparting a growing 'privateness' to Asian higher education systems. This article sets out in this wider socio-economic context to examine the rise of transnational higher education in three Asian societies: Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. With particular reference to examining how the growing prominence of privateness in higher education has challenged the conventional education governance models, this article critically examines how these Asian states have reinvented their regulatory regimes to govern the growing complexity and highly contested public-private mix in higher education.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09512748.aspen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPacific Reviewen_US
dc.subjectAuthoritarian Liberalismen_US
dc.subjectHigher Education Marketen_US
dc.subjectMarket Accelerationist Stateen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory Regimeen_US
dc.titleVarieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberazation of the higher education market and changing governance in HongKong, Singapore and Malaysiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMok, KH: ka-ho.mok@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMok, KH=rp00603en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09512740801990220en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-42549090261en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros165672-
dc.identifier.hkuros149057-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-42549090261&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage147en_US
dc.identifier.epage170en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000255221000003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMok, KH=7103141165en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0951-2748-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats