File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Consistent formulations for geometric nonlinear analysis of space framed structures

TitleConsistent formulations for geometric nonlinear analysis of space framed structures
Authors
KeywordsBuckling Analysis
Consistent Formulations
Geometric Nonlinear Analysis
Large Rotation
Space Framed Structures
Issue Date2003
Citation
Journal Of The International Association For Shell And Spatial Structures, 2003, v. 44 n. 143, p. 175-180 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper is concerned with the geometric nonlinear and buckling analyses of space framed structures emphasizing how to model the effects of geometric nonlinearity consistently. Two consistent formulations are presented in this study; one is on the basis of small rotation, while the other large rotation. The consistency makes the derived element and structural tangent stiffness matrices symmetric. Although the tangent stiffness matrices are different, these two formulations predict the same nonlinear responses and buckling loads. It is also shown in this paper that the incremental equilibrium equations for these two formulations are equivalent to those derived by Yang and Kuo (1994). However, the element tangent stiffness matrix in Yang and Kuo (1994) is asymmetric.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/177955
ISSN
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, HHen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeu, LJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-19T09:40:58Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-19T09:40:58Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of The International Association For Shell And Spatial Structures, 2003, v. 44 n. 143, p. 175-180en_US
dc.identifier.issn0304-3622en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/177955-
dc.description.abstractThis paper is concerned with the geometric nonlinear and buckling analyses of space framed structures emphasizing how to model the effects of geometric nonlinearity consistently. Two consistent formulations are presented in this study; one is on the basis of small rotation, while the other large rotation. The consistency makes the derived element and structural tangent stiffness matrices symmetric. Although the tangent stiffness matrices are different, these two formulations predict the same nonlinear responses and buckling loads. It is also shown in this paper that the incremental equilibrium equations for these two formulations are equivalent to those derived by Yang and Kuo (1994). However, the element tangent stiffness matrix in Yang and Kuo (1994) is asymmetric.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structuresen_US
dc.subjectBuckling Analysisen_US
dc.subjectConsistent Formulationsen_US
dc.subjectGeometric Nonlinear Analysisen_US
dc.subjectLarge Rotationen_US
dc.subjectSpace Framed Structuresen_US
dc.titleConsistent formulations for geometric nonlinear analysis of space framed structuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLee, HH: hhlee@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLee, HH=rp01556en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-2942566309en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-2942566309&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue143en_US
dc.identifier.spage175en_US
dc.identifier.epage180en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, HH=35757543400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeu, LJ=35549370400en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats