File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery

TitleThe validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom
Citation
International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2007, v. 36 n. 10, p. 900-908 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the two-dimensional profile prediction produced by the computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS), for the correction of class III facial deformities. Correction was by maxillary advancement (n = 17) or bimaxillary surgery (n = 16). The mean age was 24 years (range 18-42). The surgical and dental movements obtained from the postoperative cephalogram were used to produce a CASSOS profile prediction, which was compared with the soft-tissue profile. The prediction was superimposed onto the postoperative radiograph, and a coordinate system was used to measure linear differences. For the maxillary advancement group there were statistical differences for three horizontal landmarks: superior labial sulcus (p = 0.017), labrale superious (p = 0.038) and labiomental fold (p = 0.014). In the bimaxillary group only the landmark vertical labrale superious (p = 0.002) showed a statistical difference. Generally, CASSOS produced useful profile predictions for maxillary advancement surgery or bimaxillary surgery for Class III patients, although there was considerable individual variation. The main areas of inaccuracy were the lips. The major difference between the two types of surgery was that most of the errors in the maxillary surgery group were in the horizontal direction, whilst for the bimaxillary surgery the errors were mainly in the vertical direction. Crown Copyright © 2007.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174212
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.563
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.854
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, RMen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhambay, BSen_US
dc.contributor.authorMchugh, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorAyoub, AFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-22T01:58:36Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-22T01:58:36Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2007, v. 36 n. 10, p. 900-908en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174212-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the two-dimensional profile prediction produced by the computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS), for the correction of class III facial deformities. Correction was by maxillary advancement (n = 17) or bimaxillary surgery (n = 16). The mean age was 24 years (range 18-42). The surgical and dental movements obtained from the postoperative cephalogram were used to produce a CASSOS profile prediction, which was compared with the soft-tissue profile. The prediction was superimposed onto the postoperative radiograph, and a coordinate system was used to measure linear differences. For the maxillary advancement group there were statistical differences for three horizontal landmarks: superior labial sulcus (p = 0.017), labrale superious (p = 0.038) and labiomental fold (p = 0.014). In the bimaxillary group only the landmark vertical labrale superious (p = 0.002) showed a statistical difference. Generally, CASSOS produced useful profile predictions for maxillary advancement surgery or bimaxillary surgery for Class III patients, although there was considerable individual variation. The main areas of inaccuracy were the lips. The major difference between the two types of surgery was that most of the errors in the maxillary surgery group were in the horizontal direction, whilst for the bimaxillary surgery the errors were mainly in the vertical direction. Crown Copyright © 2007.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshCephalometryen_US
dc.subject.meshComputer Simulationen_US
dc.subject.meshEpidemiologic Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMalocclusion, Angle Class Iii - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgery, Computer-Assisted - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshVertical Dimensionen_US
dc.titleThe validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailKhambay, BS: bkhambay@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityKhambay, BS=rp01691en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.015en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17630252-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-35148852296en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-35148852296&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.spage900en_US
dc.identifier.epage908en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000250438200005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJones, RM=7501542797en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKhambay, BS=7003979053en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcHugh, S=7006653642en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAyoub, AF=7005361507en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats