File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/07362999808809582
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0039984512
- WOS: WOS:000076626100008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: An efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods
Title | An efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods |
---|---|
Other Titles | An efficiency comparison of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods |
Authors | |
Keywords | Martingale Difference Recapture Studies Removal Method Time Dependent Failure Intensity Weight Function Zero Mean Martingales |
Issue Date | 1998 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/07362994.asp |
Citation | Stochastic Analysis And Applications, 1998, v. 16 n. 6, p. 1129-1143 How to Cite? |
Abstract | An efficiency comparison is made in estimating the number of errors in a system using a recapture approach and a removal with seeded errors approach. We compare the Fisher information of the two methods derived from an optimal estimating function. A simulation study is given. The performance of the removal with seeded errors approach is shown to be better than the recapture approach especially when capture proportion is small. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/172079 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.599 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yip, PSF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-30T06:20:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-30T06:20:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Stochastic Analysis And Applications, 1998, v. 16 n. 6, p. 1129-1143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0736-2994 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/172079 | - |
dc.description.abstract | An efficiency comparison is made in estimating the number of errors in a system using a recapture approach and a removal with seeded errors approach. We compare the Fisher information of the two methods derived from an optimal estimating function. A simulation study is given. The performance of the removal with seeded errors approach is shown to be better than the recapture approach especially when capture proportion is small. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/07362994.asp | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Stochastic Analysis and Applications | en_US |
dc.subject | Martingale Difference | en_US |
dc.subject | Recapture Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Removal Method | en_US |
dc.subject | Time Dependent Failure Intensity | en_US |
dc.subject | Weight Function | en_US |
dc.subject | Zero Mean Martingales | en_US |
dc.title | An efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | An efficiency comparison of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods | - |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Yip, PSF: sfpyip@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Yip, PSF=rp00596 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/07362999808809582 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0039984512 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 44249 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0039984512&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1129 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 1143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000076626100008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yip, PSF=7102503720 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0736-2994 | - |