File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods

TitleAn efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods
Other TitlesAn efficiency comparison of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods
Authors
KeywordsMartingale Difference
Recapture Studies
Removal Method
Time Dependent Failure Intensity
Weight Function
Zero Mean Martingales
Issue Date1998
PublisherTaylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/07362994.asp
Citation
Stochastic Analysis And Applications, 1998, v. 16 n. 6, p. 1129-1143 How to Cite?
AbstractAn efficiency comparison is made in estimating the number of errors in a system using a recapture approach and a removal with seeded errors approach. We compare the Fisher information of the two methods derived from an optimal estimating function. A simulation study is given. The performance of the removal with seeded errors approach is shown to be better than the recapture approach especially when capture proportion is small.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172079
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.63
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.590
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYip, PSFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationStochastic Analysis And Applications, 1998, v. 16 n. 6, p. 1129-1143en_US
dc.identifier.issn0736-2994en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172079-
dc.description.abstractAn efficiency comparison is made in estimating the number of errors in a system using a recapture approach and a removal with seeded errors approach. We compare the Fisher information of the two methods derived from an optimal estimating function. A simulation study is given. The performance of the removal with seeded errors approach is shown to be better than the recapture approach especially when capture proportion is small.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/07362994.aspen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStochastic Analysis and Applicationsen_US
dc.subjectMartingale Differenceen_US
dc.subjectRecapture Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRemoval Methoden_US
dc.subjectTime Dependent Failure Intensityen_US
dc.subjectWeight Functionen_US
dc.subjectZero Mean Martingalesen_US
dc.titleAn efficiency comparsion of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methodsen_US
dc.title.alternativeAn efficiency comparison of estimating the number of errors in a system using recapture and removal methods-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailYip, PSF: sfpyip@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityYip, PSF=rp00596en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07362999808809582-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0039984512en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros44249-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0039984512&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage1129en_US
dc.identifier.epage1143en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000076626100008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYip, PSF=7102503720en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats