File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Positive and negative factors influencing the implementation of relational contracting in Public Construction Projects in Australia

TitlePositive and negative factors influencing the implementation of relational contracting in Public Construction Projects in Australia
Authors
KeywordsRelational contracting
Public construction project
Success factors
Sydney
Issue Date2012
PublisherCIB.
Citation
The 2012 International Conference on Management of Construction: Research to Practice, Montreal, Canada, 26-29 June 2012. In Conference Proceedings, 2012, p. 754-765 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite relational contracting (RC) having been used increasingly in public funded construction projects in some countries such as Australia, there are different perspectives and concerns about RC. This research aims to understand the perceptions of what makes RC attractive or otherwise as a contracting strategy for public construction projects using Australia for data collection. Literature review was used to identify relevant factors, which were incorporated into the survey questionnaire. An online questionnaire survey technique was used for primary data collection from the greater Sydney region. The survey response data was subjected to descriptive statistical analysis using SPSS software. The research results show that RC is perceived as attractive in terms of positive factors including “Improve design”, “Improve quality of project”, “Build up closer relationship with contracting parties”, “Reduce time in delivering the project” and “Enhance the organization’s reputation in the industry”. The most negative aspects and factors included “Public sector accountability concerns”, “Lack of training and guidance in relational arrangement”, “Stringent public rules, regulations and laws”, “Conservative industry culture inhibits changes and encourages preservation of the status quo”, and “Concerns about opportunistic behaviour of other contracting parties”. These negative factors may make RC arrangement less attractive. As the delivery of public facilities and services is exhibiting more RC behavioural patterns, this research suggests that at the early stage of preparing a business case, a clear and common understanding of the positive and negative factors surrounding RC by the parties involved, would provide a more informed basis for decision making.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169403
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKe, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLing, FYY-
dc.contributor.authorZou, PXW-
dc.contributor.authorWang, SQ-
dc.contributor.authorKumaraswamy, MM-
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-18T08:53:38Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-18T08:53:38Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationThe 2012 International Conference on Management of Construction: Research to Practice, Montreal, Canada, 26-29 June 2012. In Conference Proceedings, 2012, p. 754-765-
dc.identifier.isbn9782981335517-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169403-
dc.description.abstractDespite relational contracting (RC) having been used increasingly in public funded construction projects in some countries such as Australia, there are different perspectives and concerns about RC. This research aims to understand the perceptions of what makes RC attractive or otherwise as a contracting strategy for public construction projects using Australia for data collection. Literature review was used to identify relevant factors, which were incorporated into the survey questionnaire. An online questionnaire survey technique was used for primary data collection from the greater Sydney region. The survey response data was subjected to descriptive statistical analysis using SPSS software. The research results show that RC is perceived as attractive in terms of positive factors including “Improve design”, “Improve quality of project”, “Build up closer relationship with contracting parties”, “Reduce time in delivering the project” and “Enhance the organization’s reputation in the industry”. The most negative aspects and factors included “Public sector accountability concerns”, “Lack of training and guidance in relational arrangement”, “Stringent public rules, regulations and laws”, “Conservative industry culture inhibits changes and encourages preservation of the status quo”, and “Concerns about opportunistic behaviour of other contracting parties”. These negative factors may make RC arrangement less attractive. As the delivery of public facilities and services is exhibiting more RC behavioural patterns, this research suggests that at the early stage of preparing a business case, a clear and common understanding of the positive and negative factors surrounding RC by the parties involved, would provide a more informed basis for decision making.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCIB.-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Joint CIB International Conference on Management of Construction: Research to Practice-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectRelational contracting-
dc.subjectPublic construction project-
dc.subjectSuccess factors-
dc.subjectSydney-
dc.titlePositive and negative factors influencing the implementation of relational contracting in Public Construction Projects in Australia-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailKumaraswamy, MM: mohan@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKumaraswamy, MM=rp00126en_US
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros211821-
dc.identifier.spage754-
dc.identifier.epage765-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats