File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: Differentiation and integration

TitleCognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: Differentiation and integration
Authors
Issue Date2005
Citation
Journal Of Personality, 2005, v. 73 n. 4, p. 859-886 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study investigates how individuals formulate flexible coping strategies across situations by proposing differentiation and integration as two stress-appraisal processes. Results showed that participants who coped more flexibly adopted the dimensions of controllability and impact in differentiating among different stressful situations. They also deployed an integrated strategy: the deployment of more monitoring in situations perceived as controllable but less of this strategy in situations perceived as uncontrollable. Participants who coped less flexibly did not adopt any given dimensions and tended to use more monitoring regardless of situational characteristics. These results suggest that individuals with different extents of coping flexibility differ in the cognitive processes. Individuals who cope more flexibly display a greater extent of differentiation and integration than do those who cope less flexibly. These findings are translated into strategies for stress management workshops. © Blackwell Publishing 2005.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168990
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.657
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.372
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheung, MWLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-08T03:40:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-08T03:40:31Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Personality, 2005, v. 73 n. 4, p. 859-886en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3506en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168990-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates how individuals formulate flexible coping strategies across situations by proposing differentiation and integration as two stress-appraisal processes. Results showed that participants who coped more flexibly adopted the dimensions of controllability and impact in differentiating among different stressful situations. They also deployed an integrated strategy: the deployment of more monitoring in situations perceived as controllable but less of this strategy in situations perceived as uncontrollable. Participants who coped less flexibly did not adopt any given dimensions and tended to use more monitoring regardless of situational characteristics. These results suggest that individuals with different extents of coping flexibility differ in the cognitive processes. Individuals who cope more flexibly display a greater extent of differentiation and integration than do those who cope less flexibly. These findings are translated into strategies for stress management workshops. © Blackwell Publishing 2005.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Personalityen_US
dc.subject.meshAdaptation, Psychologicalen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshCognitionen_US
dc.subject.meshDefense Mechanismsen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshIndividualityen_US
dc.subject.meshInternal-External Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshLife Change Eventsen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshModels, Psychologicalen_US
dc.subject.meshPersonality - Classificationen_US
dc.subject.meshPersonality Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshPersonality Inventoryen_US
dc.subject.meshProblem Solvingen_US
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial Desirabilityen_US
dc.subject.meshStress, Psychological - Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: Differentiation and integrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheng, C:ceci-cheng@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCheng, C=rp00588en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00331.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15958137-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-21644470289en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros111222-
dc.identifier.hkuros126790-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-21644470289&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage859en_US
dc.identifier.epage886en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000229782700002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheng, C=7404798168en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, MWL=7201897549en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike228417-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats