File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?

TitleAfter the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?
Authors
Hayward, WG
Issue Date2003
PublisherElsevier Ltd, Trends Journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tics
Citation
Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 2003, v. 7 n. 10, p. 425-427 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004
AbstractA debate on whether object representations capture isolated viewpoints or ranges of views has dominated research in object recognition in recent years, but now seems to be waning. Rather than assume a narrow model in which either structural or view information is used to recognize an object, researchers have begun to examine how these properties might be used cooperatively. A recent paper by Foster and Gilson confirms sensitivity to both types of information, which combine in an additive framework to predict recognition performance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168973
ISSN
1364-6613
2023 Impact Factor: 16.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.758
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000186013000001
References
References in Scopus

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayward, WGen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-08T03:40:20Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-08T03:40:20Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.citationTrends In Cognitive Sciences, 2003, v. 7 n. 10, p. 425-427en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-6613en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168973-
dc.description.abstractA debate on whether object representations capture isolated viewpoints or ranges of views has dominated research in object recognition in recent years, but now seems to be waning. Rather than assume a narrow model in which either structural or view information is used to recognize an object, researchers have begun to examine how these properties might be used cooperatively. A recent paper by Foster and Gilson confirms sensitivity to both types of information, which combine in an additive framework to predict recognition performance.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd, Trends Journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTrends in Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAfter the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHayward, WG:whayward@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHayward, WG=rp00630en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004en_US
dc.identifier.pmid14550482-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0141756308en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141756308&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.spage425en_US
dc.identifier.epage427en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000186013000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHayward, WG=7006352956en_US
dc.identifier.issnl1364-6613-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats