Conference Paper: Distinct visual thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up?
| Title | Distinct visual thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up? |
|---|---|
| Authors | De Wit, M van der Kamp, J Masters, R |
| Issue Date | 2011 |
| Publisher | Pion Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://i-perception.perceptionweb.com/journal/I/ |
| Citation | The 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Vision (APCV 2011), Hong Kong, 15-18 July 2011. In i-Perception, 2011, v. 2 n. 4, p. 214 [How to Cite?] |
| Abstract | Unlike perceptual size judgments, actions—but not delayed actions—performed under full vision are relatively unaffected by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Controversy remains as to the source of these effects. We aimed to illuminate the problem by exploiting the possibility that vision for action and perception may have distinct thresholds. In Experiment 1 participants performed delayed pointing movements towards briefly presented (12 ms–masked) M-L targets of different sizes. While participants were unable to perceptually discriminate between targets, their movements were nevertheless a function of target size, but not of the illusion (de Wit, van der Kamp, & Masters, in press). This implies 1) that vision for action is functional even after a delay and/or 2) that distinct thresholds exists for egocentric and allocentric information pick up, possibly irrespective of whether a task is perceptual or motoric in nature. Experiment 2, in which participants manually matched the size of perceptually indiscriminable M-L targets, supports the latter option. These findings are reviewed in relation to recent discussions of the two-visual-systems model. de Wit, M.M., van der Kamp, J., & Masters, R.S.W. (in press). Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion. Neuropsychologia. |
| Description | 2011 亞太視覺會議 Talk: Action and virtual environments Open Access Journal |
| ISSN | 2041-6695-(electronic) |
| dc.contributor.author | De Wit, M |
|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | van der Kamp, J |
| dc.contributor.author | Masters, R |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T08:31:18Z |
| dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T08:31:18Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 |
| dc.description.abstract | Unlike perceptual size judgments, actions—but not delayed actions—performed under full vision are relatively unaffected by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Controversy remains as to the source of these effects. We aimed to illuminate the problem by exploiting the possibility that vision for action and perception may have distinct thresholds. In Experiment 1 participants performed delayed pointing movements towards briefly presented (12 ms–masked) M-L targets of different sizes. While participants were unable to perceptually discriminate between targets, their movements were nevertheless a function of target size, but not of the illusion (de Wit, van der Kamp, & Masters, in press). This implies 1) that vision for action is functional even after a delay and/or 2) that distinct thresholds exists for egocentric and allocentric information pick up, possibly irrespective of whether a task is perceptual or motoric in nature. Experiment 2, in which participants manually matched the size of perceptually indiscriminable M-L targets, supports the latter option. These findings are reviewed in relation to recent discussions of the two-visual-systems model. de Wit, M.M., van der Kamp, J., & Masters, R.S.W. (in press). Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion. Neuropsychologia. |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext |
| dc.description | 2011 亞太視覺會議 |
| dc.description | Talk: Action and virtual environments |
| dc.description | Open Access Journal |
| dc.description.other | The 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Vision (APCV 2011), Hong Kong, 15-18 July 2011. In i-Perception, 2011, v. 2 n. 4, p. 214 |
| dc.identifier.citation | The 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Vision (APCV 2011), Hong Kong, 15-18 July 2011. In i-Perception, 2011, v. 2 n. 4, p. 214 [How to Cite?] |
| dc.identifier.epage | 214 |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 208012 |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2041-6695-(electronic) |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 |
| dc.identifier.spage | 214 |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/166281 |
| dc.identifier.volume | 2 |
| dc.language | eng |
| dc.publisher | Pion Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://i-perception.perceptionweb.com/journal/I/ |
| dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom |
| dc.relation.ispartof | i-Perception |
| dc.title | Distinct visual thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up? |
| dc.type | Conference_Paper |