Issues in pulmonary function testing for the screening and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review article is to provide an up-to-date summary on the current evidence for or against the use of lung function tests as screening and diagnostic tools for airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to consider the relevant issues in context. RECENT FINDINGS: COPD is characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation with only partial reversibility on lung function testing. However, screening on a population basis or of an enriched 'at-risk' subset like chronic smokers is not supported by findings from previous epidemiological studies, screening trials or in currently published clinical management guidelines by professional societies and review bodies. The definition of airflow obstruction and the classification of disease severity of COPD also differ slightly between guidelines and statements from different professional societies. SUMMARY: Given the experience from previous screening trials and controversial classification of airflow obstruction by severity, it is impossible to have accurate screening results for COPD based on lung function tests alone. Clinical respiratory symptoms should be taken into consideration in terms of the diagnosis and management of COPD, as well as in any screening trial or programme that is to be attempted or implemented. © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.