File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.019
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33645873260
- PMID: 16219453
- WOS: WOS:000237093500018
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of a non-adjustable oral appliance on upper airway morphology in obstructive sleep apnoea
Title | Effect of a non-adjustable oral appliance on upper airway morphology in obstructive sleep apnoea |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Obstructive sleep apnoea Oral appliance Upper airway morphology |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rmed |
Citation | Respiratory Medicine, 2006, v. 100 n. 5, p. 897-902 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: To evaluate the effect of oral appliance (OA) on upper airway morphology and its relationship with treatment response in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Methods: Symptomatic OSA subjects were recruited. Non-adjustable OA was custom made. Variables examined at baseline and while wearing the device at 2 months included polysomnographic data, computed tomographic measurements of upper airway cross sectional area at level of velopharynx (VA) and hypopharynx (HA), upper airway volume, and cephalometric parameters. Treatment outcome was based on post-treatment apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). Results: Forty patients were recruited and 23 (7 women) completed the study. They were middle-aged (49, 40-58 years) (median, interquartile range) and overweight (BMI 26, 23.3-29.5 kg/m 2), with moderate OSA (AHI 26.4, 14.1-36). The overall post treatment AHI was 8.4 (2.4-12.5), with 14 (61%) patients showing good response (AHI<10), and the other 9 patients showing moderate response (>50% reduction in AHI but still {greater than or slanted equal to}10). OA decreased the cross-sectional area of the HA (P=0.046), showed a trend of decreasing the ratio of cross-sectional area of the HA to cross-sectional area of the VA (P=0.053) and significantly increased the overall upper airway volume (P=0.006, n=11). No significant relationship between upper airway parameters and treatment outcome was identified. Conclusions: OA altered upper airway morphometry towards a profile consistent with decreased propensity to collapse, which may thus have contributed to improvement of OSA. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162964 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.180 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sam, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ooi, CG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cooke, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ip, MS | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:25:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:25:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Respiratory Medicine, 2006, v. 100 n. 5, p. 897-902 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0954-6111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162964 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: To evaluate the effect of oral appliance (OA) on upper airway morphology and its relationship with treatment response in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Methods: Symptomatic OSA subjects were recruited. Non-adjustable OA was custom made. Variables examined at baseline and while wearing the device at 2 months included polysomnographic data, computed tomographic measurements of upper airway cross sectional area at level of velopharynx (VA) and hypopharynx (HA), upper airway volume, and cephalometric parameters. Treatment outcome was based on post-treatment apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). Results: Forty patients were recruited and 23 (7 women) completed the study. They were middle-aged (49, 40-58 years) (median, interquartile range) and overweight (BMI 26, 23.3-29.5 kg/m 2), with moderate OSA (AHI 26.4, 14.1-36). The overall post treatment AHI was 8.4 (2.4-12.5), with 14 (61%) patients showing good response (AHI<10), and the other 9 patients showing moderate response (>50% reduction in AHI but still {greater than or slanted equal to}10). OA decreased the cross-sectional area of the HA (P=0.046), showed a trend of decreasing the ratio of cross-sectional area of the HA to cross-sectional area of the VA (P=0.053) and significantly increased the overall upper airway volume (P=0.006, n=11). No significant relationship between upper airway parameters and treatment outcome was identified. Conclusions: OA altered upper airway morphometry towards a profile consistent with decreased propensity to collapse, which may thus have contributed to improvement of OSA. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rmed | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Respiratory Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Obstructive sleep apnoea | - |
dc.subject | Oral appliance | - |
dc.subject | Upper airway morphology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cephalometry | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Exhalation - Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mandibular Advancement - Instrumentation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pharynx - Pathology - Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Polysomnography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - Pathology - Physiopathology - Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of a non-adjustable oral appliance on upper airway morphology in obstructive sleep apnoea | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ip, MS:msmip@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Ip, MS=rp00347 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16219453 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33645873260 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 119020 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645873260&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 897 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 902 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000237093500018 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sam, K=6603582227 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, B=9246012800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ooi, CG=7007084909 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cooke, M=7202147454 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ip, MS=7102423259 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0954-6111 | - |