File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/jmri.20028
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-1842537944
- PMID: 15065168
- WOS: WOS:000220636800009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Screening of Colonic Tumors by Air-Inflated Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography
Title | Screening of Colonic Tumors by Air-Inflated Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Colonoscopy Large bowel Magnetic resonance imaging Polyp Tumor |
Issue Date | 2004 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1053-1807/ |
Citation | Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004, v. 19 n. 4, p. 447-452 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To assess the accuracy of air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography for the detection of colonic lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients underwent both colonoscopy and air-inflated MR colonography. Breath-hold sequences (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) coronal, and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) axial and coronal, both supine and prone) were performed with a 1.5T scanner. The detection of colonic lesions by MR colonography was then correlated with the findings from the colonoscopy performed on the same day. Results: Two patients were unable to complete the MR colonography examination. Analysis was based on the results from 34 patients (17 males and 17 females, 38-70 years old, mean age = 54.9 years) who completed both examinations. MR colonography depicted two of two colonic tumors, one of one P4 (>2 cm) polyp, one of two P2 (0.5-1 cm) polyps, and two of 11 P1 (<0,5 cm) polyps. False-positive MR colonography interpretations were noted for one P1 polyp and two P2 polyps. The overall sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of MR colonography were 38%, 67%, and 46.2%, respectively. For the detection of endoluminal lesions >5 mm, air-inflated MR colonography yielded a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 93.3%, accuracy of 91.2%, positive predictive value of 60%, and negative predictive value of 96.6%. Conclusion: Air-inflated MR colonography is a new technique that deserves further investigation. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162833 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.339 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lam, WWM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, WK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, JKL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | So, NMC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, JJY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:24:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:24:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004, v. 19 n. 4, p. 447-452 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-1807 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162833 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To assess the accuracy of air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography for the detection of colonic lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients underwent both colonoscopy and air-inflated MR colonography. Breath-hold sequences (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) coronal, and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) axial and coronal, both supine and prone) were performed with a 1.5T scanner. The detection of colonic lesions by MR colonography was then correlated with the findings from the colonoscopy performed on the same day. Results: Two patients were unable to complete the MR colonography examination. Analysis was based on the results from 34 patients (17 males and 17 females, 38-70 years old, mean age = 54.9 years) who completed both examinations. MR colonography depicted two of two colonic tumors, one of one P4 (>2 cm) polyp, one of two P2 (0.5-1 cm) polyps, and two of 11 P1 (<0,5 cm) polyps. False-positive MR colonography interpretations were noted for one P1 polyp and two P2 polyps. The overall sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of MR colonography were 38%, 67%, and 46.2%, respectively. For the detection of endoluminal lesions >5 mm, air-inflated MR colonography yielded a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 93.3%, accuracy of 91.2%, positive predictive value of 60%, and negative predictive value of 96.6%. Conclusion: Air-inflated MR colonography is a new technique that deserves further investigation. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1053-1807/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | Colonoscopy | - |
dc.subject | Large bowel | - |
dc.subject | Magnetic resonance imaging | - |
dc.subject | Polyp | - |
dc.subject | Tumor | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Air | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colon - Pathology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colonic Neoplasms - Diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colonic Polyps - Diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colonoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | False Positive Reactions | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Insufflation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Adverse Effects - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Predictive Value Of Tests | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensitivity And Specificity | en_US |
dc.title | Screening of Colonic Tumors by Air-Inflated Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, WK:waikleung@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, WK=rp01479 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jmri.20028 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15065168 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-1842537944 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842537944&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 447 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 452 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000220636800009 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, WWM=13410486800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, WK=7201504523 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, JKL=7409260468 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | So, NMC=7003780596 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sung, JJY=24473715000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1053-1807 | - |