File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1023/A:1025312319011
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0141427586
- PMID: 12975566
- WOS: WOS:000184844400003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of left ventricular function on long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold
Title | Effect of left ventricular function on long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Left ventricular function Pacing Threshold |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=1383-875X |
Citation | Journal Of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2003, v. 9 n. 1, p. 21-24 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The effect of left ventricular (LV) systolic function on the long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold is unclear. Methods and Results: We studied the effect of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on the LV pacing and sensing threshold in 56 patients (mean age: 70.2 ± 10.5 years) underwent permanent LV pacing using a self-retaining coronary sinus lead (Model 1055 K, St Jude Medical, USA). In 49 patients, the LV lead was implanted for conventional pacemaker indication (sick sinus syndrome = 14, heart block = 26 or slow atrial fibrillation = 9). The remaining 7 patients were implanted for congestive heart failure. The LV pacing and sensing threshold, and lead impedance were compared between patients with LVEF <40% (Group 1, n = 28) and LVEF >40% (Group 2, n = 28) during implant and at 3-month follow up. The LV pacing lead was successfully implanted in all patients without any lead dislodgement on follow-up. At implant, Group 1 patients had a significant lower R wave amplitude, but similar LV pacing threshold and lead impedance as compared to Group 2. However, at 3-month follow-up, Group 1 patients had a significantly higher LV pacing threshold compared to Group 2 patients. There were no significant differences in the sensing threshold and lead impedance between the two groups. Furthermore, there was also a significant interval increase in LV pacing threshold in Group 1 patients (0.94 ± 0.12 V) after 3 months, but not in Group 2 patients (0.16 ± 0.08 V, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the LV systolic function has a significant impact on the long-term LV pacing threshold. The long-term left ventricular pacing threshold in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction increased after implant and was higher than patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162717 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.767 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tse, HF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paul, VE | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Boriani, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schuchert, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Del Ojo, JL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Malinowski, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Blanc, JJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, CP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:22:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:22:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2003, v. 9 n. 1, p. 21-24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1383-875X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162717 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The effect of left ventricular (LV) systolic function on the long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold is unclear. Methods and Results: We studied the effect of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on the LV pacing and sensing threshold in 56 patients (mean age: 70.2 ± 10.5 years) underwent permanent LV pacing using a self-retaining coronary sinus lead (Model 1055 K, St Jude Medical, USA). In 49 patients, the LV lead was implanted for conventional pacemaker indication (sick sinus syndrome = 14, heart block = 26 or slow atrial fibrillation = 9). The remaining 7 patients were implanted for congestive heart failure. The LV pacing and sensing threshold, and lead impedance were compared between patients with LVEF <40% (Group 1, n = 28) and LVEF >40% (Group 2, n = 28) during implant and at 3-month follow up. The LV pacing lead was successfully implanted in all patients without any lead dislodgement on follow-up. At implant, Group 1 patients had a significant lower R wave amplitude, but similar LV pacing threshold and lead impedance as compared to Group 2. However, at 3-month follow-up, Group 1 patients had a significantly higher LV pacing threshold compared to Group 2 patients. There were no significant differences in the sensing threshold and lead impedance between the two groups. Furthermore, there was also a significant interval increase in LV pacing threshold in Group 1 patients (0.94 ± 0.12 V) after 3 months, but not in Group 2 patients (0.16 ± 0.08 V, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the LV systolic function has a significant impact on the long-term LV pacing threshold. The long-term left ventricular pacing threshold in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction increased after implant and was higher than patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=1383-875X | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Left ventricular function | - |
dc.subject | Pacing | - |
dc.subject | Threshold | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cardiac Pacing, Artificial | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Electric Impedance | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Heart Block - Physiopathology - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Heart Failure - Physiopathology - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensory Thresholds | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sick Sinus Syndrome - Physiopathology - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Stroke Volume | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Systole | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - Physiopathology - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ventricular Function, Left | en_US |
dc.title | Effect of left ventricular function on long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tse, HF:hftse@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tse, HF=rp00428 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1023/A:1025312319011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12975566 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0141427586 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141427586&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000184844400003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tse, HF=7006070805 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yu, C=7404978038 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Paul, VE=7102371840 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Boriani, G=7007079613 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Schuchert, A=7007103218 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Del Ojo, JL=6507432055 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Malinowski, K=7006007692 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Blanc, JJ=23033371500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, CP=7401968501 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1383-875X | - |