File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00890.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0035176303
- PMID: 11136274
- WOS: WOS:000166548300003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Title | Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2001 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/APT |
Citation | Alimentary Pharmacology And Therapeutics, 2001, v. 15 n. 1, p. 19-24 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Prophylactic misoprostol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with low gastric toxicity (nabumetone) has been shown to reduce mucosal injury. Aim: To compare nabumetone vs. co-therapy of naproxen with low-dose misoprostol for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NSAID users. Methods: NSAID users presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled if they required long-term NSAIDs. After ulcer healing, they were randomized to receive: naproxen (500-1000 mg/day) and misoprostol (200 μg b.d.), or nabumetone (1000-1500 mg/day) and placebo misoprostol for 24 weeks. The primary end-point was recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The secondary end-point was the proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events including ulcer bleeding, symptomatic ulcers and severe dyspepsia. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (misoprostol/naproxen 45, nabumetone 45). Recurrent bleeding occurred in 10 patients (22.2%) receiving misoprostol/naproxen compared with three (6.7%) receiving nabumetone (relative risk 3.33, 95% CI: 0.98-11.32, P = 0.069). The proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events at 24 weeks was 31.1% in the misoprostol/naproxen group and 28.9% in the nabumetone group. Conclusions: Misoprostol/naproxen is not superior to nabumetone for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Neither low-dose misoprostol nor nabumetone is adequate for high-risk NSAID users. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162516 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.794 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, FKL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, JJY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ching, JYL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, JCY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, YT | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, WK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, LY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, ACW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, SCS | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:20:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:20:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Alimentary Pharmacology And Therapeutics, 2001, v. 15 n. 1, p. 19-24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0269-2813 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/162516 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Prophylactic misoprostol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with low gastric toxicity (nabumetone) has been shown to reduce mucosal injury. Aim: To compare nabumetone vs. co-therapy of naproxen with low-dose misoprostol for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NSAID users. Methods: NSAID users presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled if they required long-term NSAIDs. After ulcer healing, they were randomized to receive: naproxen (500-1000 mg/day) and misoprostol (200 μg b.d.), or nabumetone (1000-1500 mg/day) and placebo misoprostol for 24 weeks. The primary end-point was recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The secondary end-point was the proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events including ulcer bleeding, symptomatic ulcers and severe dyspepsia. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (misoprostol/naproxen 45, nabumetone 45). Recurrent bleeding occurred in 10 patients (22.2%) receiving misoprostol/naproxen compared with three (6.7%) receiving nabumetone (relative risk 3.33, 95% CI: 0.98-11.32, P = 0.069). The proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events at 24 weeks was 31.1% in the misoprostol/naproxen group and 28.9% in the nabumetone group. Conclusions: Misoprostol/naproxen is not superior to nabumetone for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Neither low-dose misoprostol nor nabumetone is adequate for high-risk NSAID users. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/APT | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 And Over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Butanones - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Therapy, Combination | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - Chemically Induced - Prevention & Control | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Misoprostol - Administration & Dosage | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Naproxen - Administration & Dosage | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Recurrence | en_US |
dc.title | Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, WK:waikleung@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, WK=rp01479 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00890.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11136274 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0035176303 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035176303&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000166548300003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, FKL=7202586434 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sung, JJY=35405352400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ching, JYL=7005086238 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, JCY=7409253910 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, YT=35477936800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, WK=7201504523 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hui, Y=7103107510 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, LY=23003415000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lai, ACW=7102226209 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chung, SCS=19642462800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0269-2813 | - |