File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Failure of coronary sinus pacing in reducing local atrial conduction delay in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion

TitleFailure of coronary sinus pacing in reducing local atrial conduction delay in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion
Authors
KeywordsAtrial fibrillation
Atrial pacing
Conduction delay
Issue Date2000
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0147-8389&site=1
Citation
Pace - Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology, 2000, v. 23 n. 6, p. 1014-1019 How to Cite?
AbstractRecent studies suggested that distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing may prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) by reducing site dependent intraatrial conduction delay. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of high right atrial (HRA) and distal CS pacing on local conduction delay in patients with AF. The study population consisted of 10 patients with persistent AF after transvenous atrial defibrillation and 10 control subjects. The local conduction delays along the anterolateral right atrium (RA), in the CS, and at the right atrial septum (RAS), and the incidence of AF in response to an atrial extrastimulus during HRA and distal CS pacing at a drive cycle length of 400, 500, and 600 ms were evaluated. In patients with AF, distal CS and HRA pacing are associated with more prominent and similar extent of conduction delay within the atria, without any significant difference in the dispersion of conduction delay and susceptibility to AF induction (70% vs 60%, P = 0.9). In normal controls, distal CS pacing reduces the conduction delay at the RAS and CS ostium and decreases the dispersion of conduction delay and the propensity for AF induction (0% vs 50%, P = 0.03) compared to HRA pacing. The pacing drive cycle length has no significant effect on conduction delay in patients with AF and normal controls (P > 0.05). Compared to normal controls, patients with AF have significantly longer conduction delay at the RAS and along the anterolateral RA during HRA and distal CS pacing. The result of this study demonstrates that the effect of HRA and distal CS pacing on the local atrial conduction delay in patients with and without AF differ significantly. These patients with AF may have more diffuse atrial anisotropy causing the changes in conduction, and pacing from distal CS in these patients dose not reduce the propensity for AF.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/162422
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.912
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.686
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTse, HFen_US
dc.contributor.authorLau, CPen_US
dc.contributor.authorAyers, GMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T05:19:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-05T05:19:46Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationPace - Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology, 2000, v. 23 n. 6, p. 1014-1019en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/162422-
dc.description.abstractRecent studies suggested that distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing may prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) by reducing site dependent intraatrial conduction delay. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of high right atrial (HRA) and distal CS pacing on local conduction delay in patients with AF. The study population consisted of 10 patients with persistent AF after transvenous atrial defibrillation and 10 control subjects. The local conduction delays along the anterolateral right atrium (RA), in the CS, and at the right atrial septum (RAS), and the incidence of AF in response to an atrial extrastimulus during HRA and distal CS pacing at a drive cycle length of 400, 500, and 600 ms were evaluated. In patients with AF, distal CS and HRA pacing are associated with more prominent and similar extent of conduction delay within the atria, without any significant difference in the dispersion of conduction delay and susceptibility to AF induction (70% vs 60%, P = 0.9). In normal controls, distal CS pacing reduces the conduction delay at the RAS and CS ostium and decreases the dispersion of conduction delay and the propensity for AF induction (0% vs 50%, P = 0.03) compared to HRA pacing. The pacing drive cycle length has no significant effect on conduction delay in patients with AF and normal controls (P > 0.05). Compared to normal controls, patients with AF have significantly longer conduction delay at the RAS and along the anterolateral RA during HRA and distal CS pacing. The result of this study demonstrates that the effect of HRA and distal CS pacing on the local atrial conduction delay in patients with and without AF differ significantly. These patients with AF may have more diffuse atrial anisotropy causing the changes in conduction, and pacing from distal CS in these patients dose not reduce the propensity for AF.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0147-8389&site=1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillation-
dc.subjectAtrial pacing-
dc.subjectConduction delay-
dc.subject.meshAtrial Fibrillation - Physiopathology - Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshAtrial Function, Righten_US
dc.subject.meshCardiac Pacing, Artificialen_US
dc.subject.meshCoronary Vesselsen_US
dc.subject.meshElectric Countershocken_US
dc.subject.meshElectrophysiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.titleFailure of coronary sinus pacing in reducing local atrial conduction delay in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailTse, HF:hftse@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityTse, HF=rp00428en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00890.x-
dc.identifier.pmid10879388-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0034086487en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros49720-
dc.identifier.hkuros54844-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034086487&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage1014en_US
dc.identifier.epage1019en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000088047900015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTse, HF=7006070805en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, CP=7401968501en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAyers, GM=7102015157en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0147-8389-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats