File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Self-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions

TitleSelf-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions
Authors
KeywordsInjured Athletes
Safety Compliance
Self-Determination Theory
Self-Efficacy
Theory Of Planned Behaviour
Wounds And Injuries
Issue Date2012
PublisherElsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2
Elsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2
Citation
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15 n. 5, p. 398-406 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Two studies were conducted to examine how motivational regulations from self-determination theory (SDT) influenced athletes' intentions towards sport-injury rehabilitation (Study 1) and prevention behaviours (Study 2) using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as a framework. Design: A cross-sectional survey was employed. Methods: Elite athletes (Study 1: N = 214; Study 2: N = 533) completed the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire and psychometric measures of constructs from the TPB, with respect to their rehabilitation from sport injury in a hypothetical scenario (Study 1), or their injury prevention experiences (Study 2). Results: Partial least squares path analytic models indicated acceptable fit of the hypothesised model in all samples, and consistently found in both studies that autonomous motivation from SDT was positively associated with attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control from the TPB, and these three TPB variables positively predicted intentions of injury rehabilitation and prevention. Controlled motivation from SDT was, unexpectedly, positively linked to intentions, but the effect was smaller than that for autonomous motivation. Conclusions: Motivational regulations from SDT might serve as sources of information that influence athletes' intentions through their impact on the attitude, perceived social norm and controllability of injury rehabilitation and prevention. © 2012.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161401
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.756
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.484
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, DKCen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagger, MSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-24T08:31:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-24T08:31:09Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15 n. 5, p. 398-406en_US
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161401-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Two studies were conducted to examine how motivational regulations from self-determination theory (SDT) influenced athletes' intentions towards sport-injury rehabilitation (Study 1) and prevention behaviours (Study 2) using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as a framework. Design: A cross-sectional survey was employed. Methods: Elite athletes (Study 1: N = 214; Study 2: N = 533) completed the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire and psychometric measures of constructs from the TPB, with respect to their rehabilitation from sport injury in a hypothetical scenario (Study 1), or their injury prevention experiences (Study 2). Results: Partial least squares path analytic models indicated acceptable fit of the hypothesised model in all samples, and consistently found in both studies that autonomous motivation from SDT was positively associated with attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control from the TPB, and these three TPB variables positively predicted intentions of injury rehabilitation and prevention. Controlled motivation from SDT was, unexpectedly, positively linked to intentions, but the effect was smaller than that for autonomous motivation. Conclusions: Motivational regulations from SDT might serve as sources of information that influence athletes' intentions through their impact on the attitude, perceived social norm and controllability of injury rehabilitation and prevention. © 2012.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2en_US
dc.publisherElsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Science and Medicine in Sporten_US
dc.subjectInjured Athletesen_US
dc.subjectSafety Complianceen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Determination Theoryen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Efficacyen_US
dc.subjectTheory Of Planned Behaviouren_US
dc.subjectWounds And Injuriesen_US
dc.titleSelf-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.016en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22721861-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84865319470en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000308627800005-
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats