File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.016
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84865319470
- PMID: 22721861
- WOS: WOS:000308627800005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Self-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions
Title | Self-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Injured Athletes Safety Compliance Self-Determination Theory Self-Efficacy Theory Of Planned Behaviour Wounds And Injuries |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Elsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2 |
Citation | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15 n. 5, p. 398-406 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: Two studies were conducted to examine how motivational regulations from self-determination theory (SDT) influenced athletes' intentions towards sport-injury rehabilitation (Study 1) and prevention behaviours (Study 2) using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as a framework. Design: A cross-sectional survey was employed. Methods: Elite athletes (Study 1: N = 214; Study 2: N = 533) completed the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire and psychometric measures of constructs from the TPB, with respect to their rehabilitation from sport injury in a hypothetical scenario (Study 1), or their injury prevention experiences (Study 2). Results: Partial least squares path analytic models indicated acceptable fit of the hypothesised model in all samples, and consistently found in both studies that autonomous motivation from SDT was positively associated with attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control from the TPB, and these three TPB variables positively predicted intentions of injury rehabilitation and prevention. Controlled motivation from SDT was, unexpectedly, positively linked to intentions, but the effect was smaller than that for autonomous motivation. Conclusions: Motivational regulations from SDT might serve as sources of information that influence athletes' intentions through their impact on the attitude, perceived social norm and controllability of injury rehabilitation and prevention. © 2012. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161401 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.222 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, DKC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hagger, MS | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-24T08:31:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-24T08:31:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012, v. 15 n. 5, p. 398-406 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1440-2440 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161401 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Two studies were conducted to examine how motivational regulations from self-determination theory (SDT) influenced athletes' intentions towards sport-injury rehabilitation (Study 1) and prevention behaviours (Study 2) using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as a framework. Design: A cross-sectional survey was employed. Methods: Elite athletes (Study 1: N = 214; Study 2: N = 533) completed the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire and psychometric measures of constructs from the TPB, with respect to their rehabilitation from sport injury in a hypothetical scenario (Study 1), or their injury prevention experiences (Study 2). Results: Partial least squares path analytic models indicated acceptable fit of the hypothesised model in all samples, and consistently found in both studies that autonomous motivation from SDT was positively associated with attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control from the TPB, and these three TPB variables positively predicted intentions of injury rehabilitation and prevention. Controlled motivation from SDT was, unexpectedly, positively linked to intentions, but the effect was smaller than that for autonomous motivation. Conclusions: Motivational regulations from SDT might serve as sources of information that influence athletes' intentions through their impact on the attitude, perceived social norm and controllability of injury rehabilitation and prevention. © 2012. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Australia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707423/description?navopenmenu=-2 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport | en_US |
dc.subject | Injured Athletes | en_US |
dc.subject | Safety Compliance | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Determination Theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Theory Of Planned Behaviour | en_US |
dc.subject | Wounds And Injuries | en_US |
dc.title | Self-determined forms of motivation predict sport injury prevention and rehabilitation intentions | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22721861 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84865319470 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000308627800005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Australia | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1878-1861 | - |