File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?

TitleDo women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG
Citation
BJOG: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2007, v. 114 n. 1, p. 39-45 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare women's experiences of either see and treat (ST) or defer and treat (DT) at first visit to colposcopy following abnormal cytology. Design: A prospective postal questionnaire survey. Setting: Colposcopy clinics of a University Hospital. Sample: A total of 272 women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) referred to colposcopy. Methods: A total of 136 women receiving ST and a matched sample of women receiving DT (N = 136) were sent a postal questionnaire 7 days after first appointment at colposcopy to assess evaluations of their experience, psychological distress and relief. Subsequent appointment keeping was extracted from medical records. Main outcome measures: Anxiety and subsequent behaviour. Results: Women undergoing ST were significantly less anxious and more relieved than those undergoing DT. They also evaluated their first appointment as more motivationally congruent. While women undergoing ST were less likely than DTs to keep their second appointment, there was no overall difference in did not attend (DNA) rates at 15-month follow up. Conclusions: ST is psychologically beneficial and may be preferred by women with CIN2/3. © 2007 The Authors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161322
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.039
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.083
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramani, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorOrbell, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorTidy, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-24T08:30:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-24T08:30:37Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2007, v. 114 n. 1, p. 39-45en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161322-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare women's experiences of either see and treat (ST) or defer and treat (DT) at first visit to colposcopy following abnormal cytology. Design: A prospective postal questionnaire survey. Setting: Colposcopy clinics of a University Hospital. Sample: A total of 272 women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) referred to colposcopy. Methods: A total of 136 women receiving ST and a matched sample of women receiving DT (N = 136) were sent a postal questionnaire 7 days after first appointment at colposcopy to assess evaluations of their experience, psychological distress and relief. Subsequent appointment keeping was extracted from medical records. Main outcome measures: Anxiety and subsequent behaviour. Results: Women undergoing ST were significantly less anxious and more relieved than those undergoing DT. They also evaluated their first appointment as more motivationally congruent. While women undergoing ST were less likely than DTs to keep their second appointment, there was no overall difference in did not attend (DNA) rates at 15-month follow up. Conclusions: ST is psychologically beneficial and may be preferred by women with CIN2/3. © 2007 The Authors.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAnxiety - Etiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.meshColposcopy - Methods - Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.meshPhysician-Patient Relationsen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshUterine Cervical Neoplasms - Psychologyen_US
dc.titleDo women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHagger, M:martin.hagger@nottingham.ac.uken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHagger, M=rp01644en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01160.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17233858-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33845533206en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33845533206&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume114en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage39en_US
dc.identifier.epage45en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000243227100008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBalasubramani, L=15520785700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOrbell, S=7005545477en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHagger, M=6602134841en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrown, V=7202220124en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTidy, J=7004190485en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats