File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.586
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33750159363
- PMID: 17014276
- WOS: WOS:000241141200006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: "When no means no": Can reactance augment the theory of planned behavior?
Title | "When no means no": Can reactance augment the theory of planned behavior? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Cervical cancer Colposcopy Discriminant analysis Personality systems interactions theory Screening |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/hea.html |
Citation | Health Psychology, 2006, v. 25 n. 5, p. 586-594 How to Cite? |
Abstract | A longitudinal study examined women's clinic attendance for treatment and follow-up after having received an abnormal cervical screening result. Participants (N = 660) completed questionnaire measures of variables specified by the theory of planned behavior and J. Kuhl's (2000) measure of low volitional control - reactance - prior to receiving up to 3 subsequent appointments during the following 15 months. The theory of planned behavior was capable of predicting persistent attendance and discriminated women who kept all of their scheduled appointments from those who dropped out from treatment. Consideration of reactance enhanced prediction of behavior and discriminated between women who delayed appointment keeping and women who ceased attending. © 2006 APA, all rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161318 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.150 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Orbell, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hagger, M | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-24T08:30:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-24T08:30:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Health Psychology, 2006, v. 25 n. 5, p. 586-594 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0278-6133 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161318 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A longitudinal study examined women's clinic attendance for treatment and follow-up after having received an abnormal cervical screening result. Participants (N = 660) completed questionnaire measures of variables specified by the theory of planned behavior and J. Kuhl's (2000) measure of low volitional control - reactance - prior to receiving up to 3 subsequent appointments during the following 15 months. The theory of planned behavior was capable of predicting persistent attendance and discriminated women who kept all of their scheduled appointments from those who dropped out from treatment. Consideration of reactance enhanced prediction of behavior and discriminated between women who delayed appointment keeping and women who ceased attending. © 2006 APA, all rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/hea.html | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Health Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | Cervical cancer | - |
dc.subject | Colposcopy | - |
dc.subject | Discriminant analysis | - |
dc.subject | Personality systems interactions theory | - |
dc.subject | Screening | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colposcopy - Statistics & Numerical Data | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Health Behavior | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mass Screening - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Compliance - Statistics & Numerical Data | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Personal Autonomy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Psychological Theory | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Questionnaires | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Referral And Consultation - Statistics & Numerical Data | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - Epidemiology - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Volition | en_US |
dc.title | "When no means no": Can reactance augment the theory of planned behavior? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Hagger, M:martin.hagger@nottingham.ac.uk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Hagger, M=rp01644 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.586 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17014276 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33750159363 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750159363&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 586 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 594 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000241141200006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Orbell, S=7005545477 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hagger, M=6602134841 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0278-6133 | - |