File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/0887044042000334724
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-16644388229
- WOS: WOS:000228318900002
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 1
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R) in a cervical screening context
Title | A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R) in a cervical screening context |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Colposcopy Common-Sense Model Illness Cognitions Self-Regulation Theory Validity |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/08870446.asp |
Citation | Psychology And Health, 2005, v. 20 n. 2, p. 161-173 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The purpose of the present study was to test the factorial and discriminant validity of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), a measure of illness representations based on Leventhal, Meyer and Nerenz's Self-Regulation Theory, in a cervical screening context using confirmatory factor analysis. Six hundred and sixty women, who had attended a colposcopy clinic and were invited to re-attend, completed the IPQ-R. Data were analysed using covariance structure analysis. The adequacy of an a priori confirmatory factor analytic model that included seven dimensions of the cognitive illness representation: identity, timeline-acute/chronic, serious consequences, personal control, treatment control, illness coherence, and causal attributions, and one emotional representation factor was tested against the observed data. After the elimination of two items responsible for large standardised residuals and with low factor loadings, the model adequately accounted for covariances among the IPQ-R items according to multiple criteria for goodness-of-fit. Factor inter-correlations supported the discriminant validity of the constructs and the factors exhibited satisfactory composite reliability. A theoretically predictable pattern of relationships among the representation dimensions was evident. In particular, the control-related constructs and the illness coherence dimension were negatively related to other illness representation constructs. The present study provided confirmatory evidence using a robust hypothesis-testing framework to support the proposed structure of the illness representation dimensions in a cervical screening context. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161306 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.092 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hagger, MS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Orbell, S | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-24T08:30:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-24T08:30:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Psychology And Health, 2005, v. 20 n. 2, p. 161-173 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0887-0446 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161306 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of the present study was to test the factorial and discriminant validity of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), a measure of illness representations based on Leventhal, Meyer and Nerenz's Self-Regulation Theory, in a cervical screening context using confirmatory factor analysis. Six hundred and sixty women, who had attended a colposcopy clinic and were invited to re-attend, completed the IPQ-R. Data were analysed using covariance structure analysis. The adequacy of an a priori confirmatory factor analytic model that included seven dimensions of the cognitive illness representation: identity, timeline-acute/chronic, serious consequences, personal control, treatment control, illness coherence, and causal attributions, and one emotional representation factor was tested against the observed data. After the elimination of two items responsible for large standardised residuals and with low factor loadings, the model adequately accounted for covariances among the IPQ-R items according to multiple criteria for goodness-of-fit. Factor inter-correlations supported the discriminant validity of the constructs and the factors exhibited satisfactory composite reliability. A theoretically predictable pattern of relationships among the representation dimensions was evident. In particular, the control-related constructs and the illness coherence dimension were negatively related to other illness representation constructs. The present study provided confirmatory evidence using a robust hypothesis-testing framework to support the proposed structure of the illness representation dimensions in a cervical screening context. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/08870446.asp | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psychology and Health | en_US |
dc.subject | Colposcopy | en_US |
dc.subject | Common-Sense Model | en_US |
dc.subject | Illness Cognitions | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Regulation Theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Validity | en_US |
dc.title | A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R) in a cervical screening context | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Hagger, MS:martin.hagger@nottingham.ac.uk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Hagger, MS=rp01644 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/0887044042000334724 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-16644388229 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-16644388229&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 173 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000228318900002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hagger, MS=6602134841 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Orbell, S=7005545477 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 156412 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0887-0446 | - |