File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Executives' Assessments of International Joint Ventures in China: A Multi-Theoretical Investigation

TitleExecutives' Assessments of International Joint Ventures in China: A Multi-Theoretical Investigation
Authors
KeywordsExecutive decision making
International joint ventures
Policy capturing
Issue Date2012
Citation
Management And Organization Review, 2012, v. 8 n. 2, p. 311-340 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite the rich set of theories that have developed on international joint ventures (IJVs), little is known about what theoretical criteria senior executives actually incorporate in their judgments of IJV opportunities and partners. Empirical studies have often applied individual theories in a particularistic fashion, rather than recognizing the different theoretical perspectives that boundedly-rational executives may incorporate into their decision models. In this article, we combine decision criteria associated with multiple theories rooted in organizational economics to investigate how top executives process information on IJV opportunities in China. Using an established experimental technique known as policy capturing, we examine how executives cognitively weigh criteria from four prominent theories when making initial assessments of IJVs (i.e., the resource-based view, transaction cost economics, information economics, and real options theory). Our arguments and findings on executives' IJV decision models contribute to decision-making research on alliances and IJVs in China. © 2011 The International Association for Chinese Management Research.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161282
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.738
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.435
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReuer, JJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTyler, BBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTong, TWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWu, CWen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-24T08:29:12Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-24T08:29:12Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_HK
dc.identifier.citationManagement And Organization Review, 2012, v. 8 n. 2, p. 311-340en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1740-8776en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/161282-
dc.description.abstractDespite the rich set of theories that have developed on international joint ventures (IJVs), little is known about what theoretical criteria senior executives actually incorporate in their judgments of IJV opportunities and partners. Empirical studies have often applied individual theories in a particularistic fashion, rather than recognizing the different theoretical perspectives that boundedly-rational executives may incorporate into their decision models. In this article, we combine decision criteria associated with multiple theories rooted in organizational economics to investigate how top executives process information on IJV opportunities in China. Using an established experimental technique known as policy capturing, we examine how executives cognitively weigh criteria from four prominent theories when making initial assessments of IJVs (i.e., the resource-based view, transaction cost economics, information economics, and real options theory). Our arguments and findings on executives' IJV decision models contribute to decision-making research on alliances and IJVs in China. © 2011 The International Association for Chinese Management Research.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofManagement and Organization Reviewen_HK
dc.subjectExecutive decision makingen_HK
dc.subjectInternational joint venturesen_HK
dc.subjectPolicy capturingen_HK
dc.titleExecutives' Assessments of International Joint Ventures in China: A Multi-Theoretical Investigationen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailWu, CW:chweiwu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityWu, CW=rp01631en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00254.xen_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84863429118en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863429118&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume8en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage311en_HK
dc.identifier.epage340en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1740-8784-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000305963500003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridReuer, JJ=6701650764en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyler, BB=7006546662en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTong, TW=8663439700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWu, CW=54584669200en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats