File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Comparison of single port and conventional laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Title | Comparison of single port and conventional laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/ |
Citation | The 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES 2012), San Diego, CA., 7-10 March 2012. In Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, v. 26 suppl. 1, p. S187, abstract no. 38781 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: This randomized controlled study compared the operative outcome of single port
laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) and conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CLC). The primary
outcome measure was the post-operative pain.
Methods: Patients who had small cancer (\4 cm) or adenomatous polyp requiring colectomy were
randomized to have SPLC or CLC. All patients had patient controlled analgesia after operation and
their visual analogue score of pain (pain score) on day 1-3 and14 were recorded by research staff. Both
the patients and research staff were blinded to the type of procedure. Other operative outcomes and the
characteristics of the two groups of patients were also recorded prospectively and compared. Categorical
variables were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Continuous
variables were presented as their median (interquartile range) and were compared by Mann-Whitney
U test. P value of\0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results: The SPLC group had 23 patients (8 right colectomy, 3 left colectomy, 12 anterior resection)
and complication occurred in one patient who had wound infection. The CLC groups had also 23
patients (9 right colectomy, 3 left colectomy, 12 anterior resection) and complication occurred in three
patients (wound infection 92 & ileus 91). There was no operative mortality in both groups. The
comparison of patient characteristics and operative outcomes was presented in Table 1. The patient
demographics, operating time, blood loss were similar between the 2 groups. When compared to the
CLC group, the SPLC group had significantly lower pain score at rest on day 1 [3 (1–5) vs. 0 (0–2);
p\0.01], day 2 [2 (0–4) vs. 0 (0–2); p = 0.02] after operation and shorter hospital stay [5 (4–6) vs. 4
(3–4) days; p\0.01]. There was no difference in the margins of resection.
Conclusions: Single port laparoscopic colectomy is a safe procedure with low complication rate.
Compared with conventional laparoscopic colectomy, single port procedure is associated with
reduced wound pain in early post-operative period and shorter hospital stay. |
Description | Oral Presentation - Topic: Colorectal: program no. S090 SAGES Concurrent Session SS16 - Single incision |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/160430 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.120 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Poon, TCJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, CW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, JKM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, OSH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, MY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-16T06:11:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-16T06:11:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES 2012), San Diego, CA., 7-10 March 2012. In Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, v. 26 suppl. 1, p. S187, abstract no. 38781 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0930-2794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/160430 | - |
dc.description | Oral Presentation - Topic: Colorectal: program no. S090 | - |
dc.description | SAGES Concurrent Session SS16 - Single incision | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This randomized controlled study compared the operative outcome of single port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) and conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CLC). The primary outcome measure was the post-operative pain. Methods: Patients who had small cancer (\4 cm) or adenomatous polyp requiring colectomy were randomized to have SPLC or CLC. All patients had patient controlled analgesia after operation and their visual analogue score of pain (pain score) on day 1-3 and14 were recorded by research staff. Both the patients and research staff were blinded to the type of procedure. Other operative outcomes and the characteristics of the two groups of patients were also recorded prospectively and compared. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were presented as their median (interquartile range) and were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. P value of\0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: The SPLC group had 23 patients (8 right colectomy, 3 left colectomy, 12 anterior resection) and complication occurred in one patient who had wound infection. The CLC groups had also 23 patients (9 right colectomy, 3 left colectomy, 12 anterior resection) and complication occurred in three patients (wound infection 92 & ileus 91). There was no operative mortality in both groups. The comparison of patient characteristics and operative outcomes was presented in Table 1. The patient demographics, operating time, blood loss were similar between the 2 groups. When compared to the CLC group, the SPLC group had significantly lower pain score at rest on day 1 [3 (1–5) vs. 0 (0–2); p\0.01], day 2 [2 (0–4) vs. 0 (0–2); p = 0.02] after operation and shorter hospital stay [5 (4–6) vs. 4 (3–4) days; p\0.01]. There was no difference in the margins of resection. Conclusions: Single port laparoscopic colectomy is a safe procedure with low complication rate. Compared with conventional laparoscopic colectomy, single port procedure is associated with reduced wound pain in early post-operative period and shorter hospital stay. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 2012 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES 2012) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Surgical Endoscopy | - |
dc.rights | The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com | - |
dc.title | Comparison of single port and conventional laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Poon, TCJ: tcjensen@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, CW: cheucw@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Fan, JKM: drjoefan@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Poon, TCJ=rp01603 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, CW=rp00244 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00464-012-2201-z | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 204035 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 201004 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 282987 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 282982 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | suppl. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | S187, abstract no. 38781 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | S187, abstract no. 38781 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0930-2794 | - |