File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Reflections on Administrative Law in China: A Hong Kong Perspective

TitleReflections on Administrative Law in China: A Hong Kong Perspective
對中國行政法的反思:一個香港的視角
Authors
Other Contributors
Other(s):Pan, J
KeywordsAdministrative law
Administrative litigation
Judicial review
China
Hong Kong
Issue Date2012
PublisherHa'erbin Gongye Daxue. The Journal's web site is located at http://hebgydxxb-s.periodicals.net.cn/
Citation
哈爾濱工業大學學報(社會科學版), 2012, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1-5 How to Cite?
Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2012, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1-5 How to Cite?
Abstract中國的現代行政法與中國古代法律傳統沒有多大的延續性。相比較而言,英國行政法有著其引以為榮的綿延數世紀的歷史,其重心在于對行政行為的司法審查。中國行政法的結構與英國行政法的結構截然不同。在中國的行政訴訟制度中,就司法審查的范圍而言:首先,抽象行政行為不受司法審查;其次,內部行政行為不受司法審查;再者,《行政訴訟法》只授權對某些類型的具體行政行為案件進行司法審查。就行政行為的審查理由或標準而言,中國法律的有關規定要比英國或香港的較為有限。但就一方面而言,中國法律提供的審查空間和力度似乎比英國或香港更為寬泛,這便是對行政行為的事實依據的審查。 There is discontinuity between modern Chinese administrative law and the Chinese legal tradition,while English administrative law,with its focus on judicial review of administrative actions,has a proud history of several centuries.There is considerable difference between the structures of Chinese and English administrative law.In the Chinese system of administrative litigation,the following features are noteworthy regarding the scope of judicial review of administrative actions.First,Abstract administrative actions are not subject to judicial review. Secondly, internal administrative acts are not subject to judicial review. Third, the Law of Administrative Litigation only authorizes judicial review of several types of concrete administrative actions. As regards the grounds for judicial review, the provisions of Chinese law are more limited than those in England or Hong Kong. But as regards the review of the factual basis of administrative actions, Chinese law.allows more room for, and provides for a more intensive form of,judicial review.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/159556
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, AHYen_US
dc.contributor.otherPan, J-
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16T05:52:11Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-16T05:52:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citation哈爾濱工業大學學報(社會科學版), 2012, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2012, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn1009-1971-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/159556-
dc.description.abstract中國的現代行政法與中國古代法律傳統沒有多大的延續性。相比較而言,英國行政法有著其引以為榮的綿延數世紀的歷史,其重心在于對行政行為的司法審查。中國行政法的結構與英國行政法的結構截然不同。在中國的行政訴訟制度中,就司法審查的范圍而言:首先,抽象行政行為不受司法審查;其次,內部行政行為不受司法審查;再者,《行政訴訟法》只授權對某些類型的具體行政行為案件進行司法審查。就行政行為的審查理由或標準而言,中國法律的有關規定要比英國或香港的較為有限。但就一方面而言,中國法律提供的審查空間和力度似乎比英國或香港更為寬泛,這便是對行政行為的事實依據的審查。 There is discontinuity between modern Chinese administrative law and the Chinese legal tradition,while English administrative law,with its focus on judicial review of administrative actions,has a proud history of several centuries.There is considerable difference between the structures of Chinese and English administrative law.In the Chinese system of administrative litigation,the following features are noteworthy regarding the scope of judicial review of administrative actions.First,Abstract administrative actions are not subject to judicial review. Secondly, internal administrative acts are not subject to judicial review. Third, the Law of Administrative Litigation only authorizes judicial review of several types of concrete administrative actions. As regards the grounds for judicial review, the provisions of Chinese law are more limited than those in England or Hong Kong. But as regards the review of the factual basis of administrative actions, Chinese law.allows more room for, and provides for a more intensive form of,judicial review.-
dc.languagechien_US
dc.publisherHa'erbin Gongye Daxue. The Journal's web site is located at http://hebgydxxb-s.periodicals.net.cn/-
dc.relation.ispartof哈爾濱工業大學學報(社會科學版)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)en_US
dc.subjectAdministrative law-
dc.subjectAdministrative litigation-
dc.subjectJudicial review-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.titleReflections on Administrative Law in China: A Hong Kong Perspectiveen_US
dc.title對中國行政法的反思:一個香港的視角-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailChen, AHY: hrllchy@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChen, AHY=rp01240en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros204567en_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage5en_US
dc.publisher.placeChina-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats