File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-50249164281
- PMID: 18724852
- WOS: WOS:000258734000017
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation: Part I: Lateral approach
Title | A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation: Part I: Lateral approach |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Biological complications Bone augmentation Bone grafting Complications Dental implants Failures Lateral approach Longitudinal Meta-analysis Peri-implantitis Sinus augmentation Sinus floor elevation Sinus grafting Success Survival Systematic review |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE |
Citation | Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2008, v. 35 SUPPL. 8, p. 216-240 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of grafts and implants placed with sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify studies on sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Results: The search provided 839 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 175 articles resulting in 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 12,020 implants. Meta-analysis indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 3.48% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.48%-4.88%] translating into a 3-year implant survival of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.8%). However, when failure rates was analyzed on the subject level, the estimated annual failure was 6.04% (95% CI: 3.87%-9.43%) translating into 16.6% (95% CI: 10.9%-24.6%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: The insertion of dental implants in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation is a predictable treatment method showing high implant survival rates and low incidences of surgical complications. The best results (98.3% implant survival after 3 years) were obtained using rough surface implants with membrane coverage of the lateral window. © 2008 The Authors. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157957 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pjetursson, BE | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, WC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zwahlen, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:57:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:57:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2008, v. 35 SUPPL. 8, p. 216-240 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0303-6979 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of grafts and implants placed with sinus floor elevation. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify studies on sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading. Results: The search provided 839 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 175 articles resulting in 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 12,020 implants. Meta-analysis indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 3.48% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.48%-4.88%] translating into a 3-year implant survival of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.8%). However, when failure rates was analyzed on the subject level, the estimated annual failure was 6.04% (95% CI: 3.87%-9.43%) translating into 16.6% (95% CI: 10.9%-24.6%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years. Conclusion: The insertion of dental implants in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation is a predictable treatment method showing high implant survival rates and low incidences of surgical complications. The best results (98.3% implant survival after 3 years) were obtained using rough surface implants with membrane coverage of the lateral window. © 2008 The Authors. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Periodontology | en_US |
dc.subject | Biological complications | - |
dc.subject | Bone augmentation | - |
dc.subject | Bone grafting | - |
dc.subject | Complications | - |
dc.subject | Dental implants | - |
dc.subject | Failures | - |
dc.subject | Lateral approach | - |
dc.subject | Longitudinal | - |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Peri-implantitis | - |
dc.subject | Sinus augmentation | - |
dc.subject | Sinus floor elevation | - |
dc.subject | Sinus grafting | - |
dc.subject | Success | - |
dc.subject | Survival | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Substitutes - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis Design | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Restoration Failure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Graft Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxilla - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxillary Sinus - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Membranes, Artificial | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Analysis | en_US |
dc.title | A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation: Part I: Lateral approach | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18724852 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-50249164281 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 153610 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-50249164281&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | SUPPL. 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 216 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 240 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000258734000017 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Denmark | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pjetursson, BE=6506841442 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tan, WC=15052310400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zwahlen, M=7004748418 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0303-6979 | - |