File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A re-examination of lardy-donnithorne debate in the provincial context of guangdong, 1949-1992

TitleA re-examination of lardy-donnithorne debate in the provincial context of guangdong, 1949-1992
Authors
Issue Date1998
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10670564.asp
Citation
Journal Of Contemporary China, 1998, v. 7 n. 17, p. 61-87 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper re-examines the Lardy-Donnithorne debate in the provincial context of Guangdong. The study period is from 1949 to 1992. In the first place, the adequacy of provincial capital investment is evaluated against its population and national income shares. Secondly, it examines the capital construction investment from the administrative perspective with capital construction projects classified into central, ministry-supported and local projects. Thirdly, it looks at the relationship from the financial perspective through a breakdown of capital construction investment by sources of investment funds, that is, state appropriation, domestic loans, foreign investment and self-raised funds and others. Fourthly, the central-local relationship is scrutinized through the fiscal relationship between the central and Guangdong governments. Lastly, extra-budgetary funds data, whenever available, are also analyzed. The paper finds that the centripetal and centrifugal forces in Guangdong have always been in dynamic and precarious balance both before and after the Open Policy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/157805
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.933
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.730
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoo, BPYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:55:45Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:55:45Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Contemporary China, 1998, v. 7 n. 17, p. 61-87en_US
dc.identifier.issn1067-0564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/157805-
dc.description.abstractThis paper re-examines the Lardy-Donnithorne debate in the provincial context of Guangdong. The study period is from 1949 to 1992. In the first place, the adequacy of provincial capital investment is evaluated against its population and national income shares. Secondly, it examines the capital construction investment from the administrative perspective with capital construction projects classified into central, ministry-supported and local projects. Thirdly, it looks at the relationship from the financial perspective through a breakdown of capital construction investment by sources of investment funds, that is, state appropriation, domestic loans, foreign investment and self-raised funds and others. Fourthly, the central-local relationship is scrutinized through the fiscal relationship between the central and Guangdong governments. Lastly, extra-budgetary funds data, whenever available, are also analyzed. The paper finds that the centripetal and centrifugal forces in Guangdong have always been in dynamic and precarious balance both before and after the Open Policy.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10670564.aspen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Chinaen_US
dc.titleA re-examination of lardy-donnithorne debate in the provincial context of guangdong, 1949-1992en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLoo, BPY: bpyloo@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLoo, BPY=rp00608en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0031926551en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros33887-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031926551&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue17en_US
dc.identifier.spage61en_US
dc.identifier.epage87en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLoo, BPY=7005145560en_US
dc.customcontrol.immutablesml 130419-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats