File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/1049909109358407
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77955313512
- PMID: 20167833
- WOS: WOS:000280707400006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Reliability and validity of the euthanasia attitude scale (EAS) for Hong Kong medical doctors
Title | Reliability and validity of the euthanasia attitude scale (EAS) for Hong Kong medical doctors |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | doctors Euthanasia Attitude Scale Hong Kong reliability validity |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | American Journal Of Hospice And Palliative Medicine, 2010, v. 27 n. 5, p. 320-324 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) in Hong Kong medical doctors. A total of 107 medical doctors (61.7% men) participated in a survey at clinical settings in 2008. The 21-item EAS was used to assess their attitudes toward euthanasia. The mean (standard deviation) and median of the EAS were 63.60 (60.31) and 63.00. Total EAS scores correlated well with "Ethical Considerations," "Practical Considerations," and "Treasuring Life" (Spearman ρ =.37-.96, P <.001) but not "Naturalistic Beliefs." The construct validity of the 3-factor model was appropriate (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin [KMO] value = 0.90) and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach α =.79-.92). Euthanasia Attitude Scale may be a reliable and valid measure for assessing the attitudes toward euthanasia in medical professionals. © The Author(s) 2010. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157718 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.706 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tang, WK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, KK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kam, PMH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, JWK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, DCY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Suen, TL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, MCK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, AKC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wan, YT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wan, HY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hussain, A | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:54:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:54:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | American Journal Of Hospice And Palliative Medicine, 2010, v. 27 n. 5, p. 320-324 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1049-9091 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157718 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) in Hong Kong medical doctors. A total of 107 medical doctors (61.7% men) participated in a survey at clinical settings in 2008. The 21-item EAS was used to assess their attitudes toward euthanasia. The mean (standard deviation) and median of the EAS were 63.60 (60.31) and 63.00. Total EAS scores correlated well with "Ethical Considerations," "Practical Considerations," and "Treasuring Life" (Spearman ρ =.37-.96, P <.001) but not "Naturalistic Beliefs." The construct validity of the 3-factor model was appropriate (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin [KMO] value = 0.90) and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach α =.79-.92). Euthanasia Attitude Scale may be a reliable and valid measure for assessing the attitudes toward euthanasia in medical professionals. © The Author(s) 2010. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | en_HK |
dc.subject | doctors | en_HK |
dc.subject | Euthanasia Attitude Scale | en_HK |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.subject | reliability | en_HK |
dc.subject | validity | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Attitude Of Health Personnel | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Attitude To Death | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cultural Characteristics | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Euthanasia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Physician's Practice Patterns - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Physicians - Statistics & Numerical Data | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Psychometrics | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Questionnaires - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility Of Results | en_US |
dc.title | Reliability and validity of the euthanasia attitude scale (EAS) for Hong Kong medical doctors | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, WK: evelynt@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, WK=rp01629 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1049909109358407 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20167833 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77955313512 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955313512&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 320 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 324 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1938-2715 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000280707400006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, WK=37462250200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mak, KK=19934230600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kam, PMH=37018382000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, JWK=36559246100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, DCY=37018031200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Suen, TL=37018778900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, MCK=37018508900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheng, AKC=37017941900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wan, YT=37018789000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wan, HY=37018761500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hussain, A=37018154600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1049-9091 | - |