File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2002.00219.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0038052936
- PMID: 12366760
- WOS: WOS:000178478200002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Impact of donor arm skin disinfection on the bacterial contamination rate of platelet concentrates
Title | Impact of donor arm skin disinfection on the bacterial contamination rate of platelet concentrates |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bacterial contamination Blood transfusion Disinfection Platelet concentrates Sepsis |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/VOX |
Citation | Vox Sanguinis, 2002, v. 83 n. 3, p. 204-208 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background and Objectives: Despite improved methods for detecting bacterial contamination of blood products, bacterial sepsis remains a significant risk in blood transfusion. This study was undertaken to investigate whether adopting a different skin disinfection protocol could reduce the rate of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates. Materials and Methods: Two skin disinfection protocols were consecutively used in the routine blood collection setting during two 10-month periods: 0.5% cetrimide/0.05% chlorhexidine solution followed by 70% isopropyl alcohol (first 10-month time-period); and 10% povidone-iodine followed by 70% isopropyl alcohol (second 10-month time-period). The rates of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates were monitored by using a surveillance programme described previously. Results: The overall bacterial contamination rate in the first time-period was 0.072%. After introduction of the povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol protocol, the bacterial contamination rate decreased to 0.042% (relative risk reduction: -0.42; 95% confidence interval, -0.12 to -0.61, P = 0.009). There were no differences in the types of micro-organisms identified (P = 0.7). Conclusions: Skin disinfection by povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol is more effective than that by cetrimide/chorhexidine and isopropyl alcohol in reducing venepuncture-associated contamination of platelet concentrates by skin flora. Our data indicate that the disinfection protocol should be used on a routine basis and such implementation should translate into a significant improvement in blood safety to patients receiving platelet transfusion. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157359 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.699 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, CK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, PL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, NK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, CK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:49:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:49:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Vox Sanguinis, 2002, v. 83 n. 3, p. 204-208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0042-9007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157359 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Objectives: Despite improved methods for detecting bacterial contamination of blood products, bacterial sepsis remains a significant risk in blood transfusion. This study was undertaken to investigate whether adopting a different skin disinfection protocol could reduce the rate of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates. Materials and Methods: Two skin disinfection protocols were consecutively used in the routine blood collection setting during two 10-month periods: 0.5% cetrimide/0.05% chlorhexidine solution followed by 70% isopropyl alcohol (first 10-month time-period); and 10% povidone-iodine followed by 70% isopropyl alcohol (second 10-month time-period). The rates of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates were monitored by using a surveillance programme described previously. Results: The overall bacterial contamination rate in the first time-period was 0.072%. After introduction of the povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol protocol, the bacterial contamination rate decreased to 0.042% (relative risk reduction: -0.42; 95% confidence interval, -0.12 to -0.61, P = 0.009). There were no differences in the types of micro-organisms identified (P = 0.7). Conclusions: Skin disinfection by povidone-iodine and isopropyl alcohol is more effective than that by cetrimide/chorhexidine and isopropyl alcohol in reducing venepuncture-associated contamination of platelet concentrates by skin flora. Our data indicate that the disinfection protocol should be used on a routine basis and such implementation should translate into a significant improvement in blood safety to patients receiving platelet transfusion. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/VOX | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Vox Sanguinis | en_US |
dc.subject | Bacterial contamination | - |
dc.subject | Blood transfusion | - |
dc.subject | Disinfection | - |
dc.subject | Platelet concentrates | - |
dc.subject | Sepsis | - |
dc.subject.mesh | 2-Propanol - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Arm | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bacterial Infections - Prevention & Control - Transmission | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Blood Donors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Blood Platelets - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Blood Specimen Collection | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cetrimonium Compounds - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disinfectants - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disinfection - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Platelet Transfusion - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Povidone-Iodine - Pharmacology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Skin - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of donor arm skin disinfection on the bacterial contamination rate of platelet concentrates | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, PL:plho@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, PL=rp00406 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2002.00219.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12366760 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0038052936 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038052936&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 83 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 204 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000178478200002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, CK=7410141588 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, PL=7402211363 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, NK=7101677541 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mak, A=7103123343 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hong, J=7404118670 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lin, CK=15034856400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0042-9007 | - |