File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.yofte.2011.07.015
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-80455174653
- WOS: WOS:000296720400008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Multi-cabinet implementation for load-balanced optical switch
Title | Multi-cabinet implementation for load-balanced optical switch | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||||||
Keywords | All-optical Line card Load-balanced Load-balanced switches Multi-cabinet implementation | ||||||||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||||||||
Publisher | Academic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/yofte | ||||||||||
Citation | Optical Fiber Technology, 2011, v. 17 n. 6, p. 574-579 How to Cite? | ||||||||||
Abstract | Load-Balanced Optical Switch (LBOS) [20] ensures close-to-100% throughout and all-optical transmission between linecards. In this paper, we extend LBOS for multi-cabinet implementation. The challenges lie in the fact that the practical implementation requirements in single-cabinet LBOS become un-scalable for multi-cabinet scenario. First of all, we remove the restriction on LBOS that propagation delay (t p) between adjacent linecards must equal to the transmission time (t pkt) for sending one packet. The delay t p is relaxed to be any value, which can accommodate the long and unequal distances fibers among cabinets. Secondly, we outstrip the upper bound of switch size N = 160 in LBOS. The basic idea is that the adjacent linecards share an identical channel/wavelength. Then LBOS can be scaled to support the large switch size of multi-cabinet. Last but not least, a more feasible fair scheduler is devised to replace the original one in LBOS. The simulation results show that multi-cabinet LBOS yields a much better delay/throughput performance than other multi-cabinet optical switches (e.g. Fasnet [8]). © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||||||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/155690 | ||||||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.583 | ||||||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This work was supported in part by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. Y1100388), Zhejiang Provincial Public Technology Research of China (No. 2010C31071), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2010QNA5032), National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2011ZX03003-003-03). | ||||||||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hu, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, KL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Z | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:34:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:34:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Optical Fiber Technology, 2011, v. 17 n. 6, p. 574-579 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1068-5200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/155690 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Load-Balanced Optical Switch (LBOS) [20] ensures close-to-100% throughout and all-optical transmission between linecards. In this paper, we extend LBOS for multi-cabinet implementation. The challenges lie in the fact that the practical implementation requirements in single-cabinet LBOS become un-scalable for multi-cabinet scenario. First of all, we remove the restriction on LBOS that propagation delay (t p) between adjacent linecards must equal to the transmission time (t pkt) for sending one packet. The delay t p is relaxed to be any value, which can accommodate the long and unequal distances fibers among cabinets. Secondly, we outstrip the upper bound of switch size N = 160 in LBOS. The basic idea is that the adjacent linecards share an identical channel/wavelength. Then LBOS can be scaled to support the large switch size of multi-cabinet. Last but not least, a more feasible fair scheduler is devised to replace the original one in LBOS. The simulation results show that multi-cabinet LBOS yields a much better delay/throughput performance than other multi-cabinet optical switches (e.g. Fasnet [8]). © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Academic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/yofte | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Optical Fiber Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | All-optical | en_US |
dc.subject | Line card | en_US |
dc.subject | Load-balanced | en_US |
dc.subject | Load-balanced switches | - |
dc.subject | Multi-cabinet implementation | - |
dc.title | Multi-cabinet implementation for load-balanced optical switch | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Hu, B: binghu@zju.edu.cn | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Yeung, KL: kyeung@eee.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Zhang, Z: ning_ming@zju.edu.cn | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yeung, KL=rp00204 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.yofte.2011.07.015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-80455174653 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 210602 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80455174653&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 574 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 579 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000296720400008 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zhang, Z=35263460700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeung, KL=7202424908 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hu, B=36617158500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 9806804 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1068-5200 | - |