File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison study of two channel assignment schemes

TitleComparison study of two channel assignment schemes
Authors
Issue Date2000
PublisherThe Institution of Engineering and Technology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ieedl.org/EL
Citation
Electronics Letters, 2000, v. 36 n. 4, p. 354-355 How to Cite?
AbstractA performance assessment and comparison is presented of the two categories of channel assignment (CA) algorithms, namely, the heuristic algorithm based on the minimum span problem and the proposed modified simulated annealing (MSA) algorithm based on violation minimization. The performance is measured in terms of the total violation factor of the assignment. The results show that the proposed MSA algorithm is superior to the heuristic algorithm. In particular, results for the MSA are >100% better than those of the heuristic algorithm for difficult assignment problems.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/155123
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.854
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.549
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThavarajah, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorLam, WHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:31:57Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:31:57Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationElectronics Letters, 2000, v. 36 n. 4, p. 354-355en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-5194en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/155123-
dc.description.abstractA performance assessment and comparison is presented of the two categories of channel assignment (CA) algorithms, namely, the heuristic algorithm based on the minimum span problem and the proposed modified simulated annealing (MSA) algorithm based on violation minimization. The performance is measured in terms of the total violation factor of the assignment. The results show that the proposed MSA algorithm is superior to the heuristic algorithm. In particular, results for the MSA are >100% better than those of the heuristic algorithm for difficult assignment problems.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Institution of Engineering and Technology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ieedl.org/ELen_US
dc.relation.ispartofElectronics Lettersen_US
dc.titleComparison study of two channel assignment schemesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLam, WH:whlam@eee.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLam, WH=rp00136en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/el:20000243en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033888586en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033888586&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage354en_US
dc.identifier.epage355en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000085671500047-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridThavarajah, A=6506905062en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, WH=7203021916en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats