File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesion restorations using a HEMA-free adhesive: Three-year results

TitleClinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesion restorations using a HEMA-free adhesive: Three-year results
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2011, v. 56 n. 4, p. 401-405 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The use of all-in-one resin-based adhesives in clinical practice has continued to increase. The aim of this study was to evaluate retention and marginal staining of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive Go! (SDI, Australia) and Ice resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Methods: Forty-one restorations were placed in 13 patients (age range 44-72 years). Human Ethics Committee approval from the University of Melbourne and Dental Health Services Victoria was obtained. Restorations were bonded and placed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enamel etching was performed on NCCL margins after cleaning with pumice and water. Patients were recalled at six months and one, two and three years. Restorations were evaluated for retention and marginal staining, and photographic records of restorations were obtained. Results: At three years, six patients were available for recall with 23 restoration sites reviewed. At the six-month recall, three restorations had been lost, with a further two lost at two years. At three years, an overall cumulative retention rate of 85% was calculated using survival analysis. Fifteen of the 23 restorations showed slight marginal staining. Conclusions: At three years, the overall retention rate of 85% indicates a satisfactory result for this new adhesive. Marginal staining was regarded as minimal. © 2011 Australian Dental Association.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154690
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Southern Dental Industries Ltd, Australia
Funding Information:

The project was sponsored by Southern Dental Industries Ltd, Australia. The author would like to thank Dental Health Services Victoria and the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne for use of its clinical facilities.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:56Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2011, v. 56 n. 4, p. 401-405en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154690-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of all-in-one resin-based adhesives in clinical practice has continued to increase. The aim of this study was to evaluate retention and marginal staining of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive Go! (SDI, Australia) and Ice resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Methods: Forty-one restorations were placed in 13 patients (age range 44-72 years). Human Ethics Committee approval from the University of Melbourne and Dental Health Services Victoria was obtained. Restorations were bonded and placed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enamel etching was performed on NCCL margins after cleaning with pumice and water. Patients were recalled at six months and one, two and three years. Restorations were evaluated for retention and marginal staining, and photographic records of restorations were obtained. Results: At three years, six patients were available for recall with 23 restoration sites reviewed. At the six-month recall, three restorations had been lost, with a further two lost at two years. At three years, an overall cumulative retention rate of 85% was calculated using survival analysis. Fifteen of the 23 restorations showed slight marginal staining. Conclusions: At three years, the overall retention rate of 85% indicates a satisfactory result for this new adhesive. Marginal staining was regarded as minimal. © 2011 Australian Dental Association.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshComposite Resinsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agentsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMethacrylatesen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth Abrasion - Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth Cervixen_US
dc.titleClinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesion restorations using a HEMA-free adhesive: Three-year resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01370.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22126350-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-82455163671en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-82455163671&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage401en_US
dc.identifier.epage405en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000297503100012-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats