File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02332.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84862168980
- PMID: 22092470
- WOS: WOS:000304992500003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral - an experimental study in dogs
Title | Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral - an experimental study in dogs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||
Keywords | Alveolar Process Augmentation Bony Crest Dbbm Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Dimensional Changes Extraction Socket Immediate Implantation Implant Dentistry Soft Tissue Alterations | ||||||
Issue Date | 2012 | ||||||
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||||
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 7, p. 789-796 How to Cite? | ||||||
Abstract | Aim: To evaluate the soft tissue and the dimensional changes of the alveolar bony crest at sites where deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles, concomitantly with the placement of a collagen membrane, were used at implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. Material and methods: The pulp tissue of the mesial roots of 3P3 was removed in six Labrador dogs, and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemi-sectioned, and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus, and implants were placed. At the test sites, DBBM particles were placed in the residual marginal defects concomitantly with the placement of a collagen membrane. No treatment augmentation was performed at the control sites. A non-submerged healing was allowed. Impressions were obtained at baseline and at the time of sacrifice performed 4 months after surgery. The cast models obtained were analyzed using an optical system to evaluate dimensional variations. Block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and soft tissue assessments. Results: After 4 months of healing, no differences in soft tissue dimensions were found between the test and control sites based on the histological assessments. The location of the soft tissue at the buccal aspect was, however, more coronal at the test compared with the control sites (1.8 ± 0.8 and 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, respectively). At the three-dimensional evaluation, the margin of the soft tissues at the buccal aspect appeared to be located more apically and lingually. The vertical dislocation was 1 ± 0.6 and 2.7 ± 0.5 mm at the test and control sites, respectively. The area of the buccal shrinkage of the alveolar crest was significantly smaller at the test sites (5.9 ± 2.4 mm2) compared with the control sites (11.5 ± 1.7 mm2). Conclusion: The use of DBBM particles concomitantly with the application of a collagen membrane used at implants placed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction contributed to the preservation of the alveolar process. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | ||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154682 | ||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 | ||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy, and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing, as well as contributions of the Engineers Marco Cesarotto and Francesco Buratto (Sweden & Martina, Due Carrre, Padova, Italy) in the 3D image preparation and assessments are highly appreciated. DBBM particles and collagen membranes have been kindly provided by Geistlich Biomaterials AG, Wolhusen LU, Switzerland. All the authors declare no conflict of interest with the materials used in the present study. |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Caneva, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Botticelli, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Morelli, F | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cesaretti, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Beolchini, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:26:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:26:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 7, p. 789-796 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154682 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To evaluate the soft tissue and the dimensional changes of the alveolar bony crest at sites where deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles, concomitantly with the placement of a collagen membrane, were used at implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. Material and methods: The pulp tissue of the mesial roots of 3P3 was removed in six Labrador dogs, and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemi-sectioned, and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus, and implants were placed. At the test sites, DBBM particles were placed in the residual marginal defects concomitantly with the placement of a collagen membrane. No treatment augmentation was performed at the control sites. A non-submerged healing was allowed. Impressions were obtained at baseline and at the time of sacrifice performed 4 months after surgery. The cast models obtained were analyzed using an optical system to evaluate dimensional variations. Block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and soft tissue assessments. Results: After 4 months of healing, no differences in soft tissue dimensions were found between the test and control sites based on the histological assessments. The location of the soft tissue at the buccal aspect was, however, more coronal at the test compared with the control sites (1.8 ± 0.8 and 0.9 ± 0.8 mm, respectively). At the three-dimensional evaluation, the margin of the soft tissues at the buccal aspect appeared to be located more apically and lingually. The vertical dislocation was 1 ± 0.6 and 2.7 ± 0.5 mm at the test and control sites, respectively. The area of the buccal shrinkage of the alveolar crest was significantly smaller at the test sites (5.9 ± 2.4 mm2) compared with the control sites (11.5 ± 1.7 mm2). Conclusion: The use of DBBM particles concomitantly with the application of a collagen membrane used at implants placed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction contributed to the preservation of the alveolar process. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.subject | Alveolar Process | en_US |
dc.subject | Augmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Bony Crest | en_US |
dc.subject | Dbbm | en_US |
dc.subject | Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral | en_US |
dc.subject | Dimensional Changes | en_US |
dc.subject | Extraction Socket | en_US |
dc.subject | Immediate Implantation | en_US |
dc.subject | Implant Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Soft Tissue Alterations | en_US |
dc.title | Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral - an experimental study in dogs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02332.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22092470 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84862168980 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 200675 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000304992500003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Caneva, M=35247602500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Botticelli, D=6601962395 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Morelli, F=53863719900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cesaretti, G=53863136900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Beolchini, M=51161082900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |