File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Stereoscopic Technique for Conversion of Radiographic Guide into Implant Surgical Guide

TitleStereoscopic Technique for Conversion of Radiographic Guide into Implant Surgical Guide
Authors
KeywordsComputer-Aided Design
Dental Implant
Implant Placement
Radiographic Guide
Stereoscopic Technique
Surgical Guide
Issue Date2013
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-0899&site=1
Citation
Clinical Implant Dentistry And Related Research, 2013, v. 15 n. 4, p. 613-624 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into surgical guide for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: Ten partially dentate patients requiring 18 implants for tooth replacement were recruited. Radiographic guides were modified with the addition of index rods for double computed tomography scanning. Implant positions were planned with implant planning software, and the stereoscopic angulations were measured. The radiographic guides were converted into surgical guides using either a generic bench drill (Group A, n=9) or a milling machine (Group B, n=9). Stereolithographic surgical guides were also made for three patients (Group S, n=5). Differences between the planned and actual angulations were tested by pair-sample t-test. Difference of mean angle deviation among groups was tested by Brown-Forsythe test. Differences were considered significant if p<.05. Results: Eighteen implant sites were successfully treated with the converted surgical guides. The mean angle deviation of Group A (1.3±0.6°) was significantly greater than Group S (0.4±0.6°), while no differences were found between Group B (0.9±0.3°) and Group S. The linear error was greatest in Group A with 1.5mm at the head and 1.8mm at the apex of the implant. Conclusions: The use of this new stereoscopic technique appears to be an acceptable alternative method for converting radiographic guide into surgical guide. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154681
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.152
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.165
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, PWKen_US
dc.contributor.authorChik, FFen_US
dc.contributor.authorPow, EHNen_US
dc.contributor.authorChow, TWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:53Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Implant Dentistry And Related Research, 2013, v. 15 n. 4, p. 613-624en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154681-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into surgical guide for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: Ten partially dentate patients requiring 18 implants for tooth replacement were recruited. Radiographic guides were modified with the addition of index rods for double computed tomography scanning. Implant positions were planned with implant planning software, and the stereoscopic angulations were measured. The radiographic guides were converted into surgical guides using either a generic bench drill (Group A, n=9) or a milling machine (Group B, n=9). Stereolithographic surgical guides were also made for three patients (Group S, n=5). Differences between the planned and actual angulations were tested by pair-sample t-test. Difference of mean angle deviation among groups was tested by Brown-Forsythe test. Differences were considered significant if p<.05. Results: Eighteen implant sites were successfully treated with the converted surgical guides. The mean angle deviation of Group A (1.3±0.6°) was significantly greater than Group S (0.4±0.6°), while no differences were found between Group B (0.9±0.3°) and Group S. The linear error was greatest in Group A with 1.5mm at the head and 1.8mm at the apex of the implant. Conclusions: The use of this new stereoscopic technique appears to be an acceptable alternative method for converting radiographic guide into surgical guide. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-0899&site=1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Researchen_US
dc.subjectComputer-Aided Designen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.subjectImplant Placementen_US
dc.subjectRadiographic Guideen_US
dc.subjectStereoscopic Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Guideen_US
dc.titleStereoscopic Technique for Conversion of Radiographic Guide into Implant Surgical Guideen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailPow, EHN:ehnpow@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChow, TW:twchow@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityPow, EHN=rp00030en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChow, TW=rp00009en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00386.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21985642-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84881220604en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros225549-
dc.identifier.eissn1708-8208-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000322580400015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, PWK=52563109100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChik, FF=52563081400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPow, EHN=6603825799en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChow, TW=7203012369en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats