File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions-results at 3 years

TitleComparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions-results at 3 years
Authors
KeywordsAll-In-One Adhesive
Clinical Study
Dentine Bonding
Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
Resin-Based Adhesive
Issue Date2012
PublisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00784/index.htm
Citation
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2012, v. 16 n. 4, p. 1089-1094 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of S3 Bond (Kuraray Corp., Japan) and G-Bond (GC Corp., Japan) all-in-one bonding agents, over 3 years in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Ethics Committee approval was obtained, and 60 restorations were placed in 11 patients aged 45-84 years (mean 60.5 years), using either Clearfil ST resin composite (Kuraray) and S3 Bond or Gradia resin composite (GC) and G-Bond alternately, without phosphoric acid etch on the uncut enamel margins. Patients were recalled at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, and photographs were taken for assessment of colour match and marginal discoloration. One patient was not available at 3 years, resulting in 54 restorations being available for evaluation. One restoration of S3/Clearfil ST was lost at 2 years, giving retention rates of 97% for S3 and 100% for G-Bond. At 3 years, six restorations for S3/Clearfil ST showed slight marginal discoloration and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. For G-Bond/Gradia at 3 years, 11 restorations exhibited slight marginal staining and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. Most restorations were bonded to sclerotic dentin. Statistical analysis of marginal staining showed no significant difference between the two restoration groups. The degree of marginal staining was almost identical for both materials and tended to be in larger restorations. Both S3 and G-Bond all-in-one bonding systems appear to be good adhesives for the restoration of NCCL for the length of the current study. Restoration of NCCLs with the newer all-in-one adhesives appears to be a viable alternative technique to more complicated adhesive materials. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154672
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.207
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.752
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTyas, MJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:51Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, 2012, v. 16 n. 4, p. 1089-1094en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154672-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of S3 Bond (Kuraray Corp., Japan) and G-Bond (GC Corp., Japan) all-in-one bonding agents, over 3 years in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Ethics Committee approval was obtained, and 60 restorations were placed in 11 patients aged 45-84 years (mean 60.5 years), using either Clearfil ST resin composite (Kuraray) and S3 Bond or Gradia resin composite (GC) and G-Bond alternately, without phosphoric acid etch on the uncut enamel margins. Patients were recalled at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, and photographs were taken for assessment of colour match and marginal discoloration. One patient was not available at 3 years, resulting in 54 restorations being available for evaluation. One restoration of S3/Clearfil ST was lost at 2 years, giving retention rates of 97% for S3 and 100% for G-Bond. At 3 years, six restorations for S3/Clearfil ST showed slight marginal discoloration and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. For G-Bond/Gradia at 3 years, 11 restorations exhibited slight marginal staining and one restoration pronounced marginal staining. Most restorations were bonded to sclerotic dentin. Statistical analysis of marginal staining showed no significant difference between the two restoration groups. The degree of marginal staining was almost identical for both materials and tended to be in larger restorations. Both S3 and G-Bond all-in-one bonding systems appear to be good adhesives for the restoration of NCCL for the length of the current study. Restoration of NCCLs with the newer all-in-one adhesives appears to be a viable alternative technique to more complicated adhesive materials. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00784/index.htmen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.subjectAll-In-One Adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectClinical Studyen_US
dc.subjectDentine Bondingen_US
dc.subjectNon-Carious Cervical Lesionsen_US
dc.subjectResin-Based Adhesiveen_US
dc.titleComparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions-results at 3 yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-011-0595-yen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21789590-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84864280265en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros190319-
dc.identifier.spage1089en_US
dc.identifier.epage1094en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000306590000010-
dc.publisher.placeGermanyen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyas, MJ=35316181100en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike9663733-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats