File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Associations between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life among young adults: Does it depend on how you assess them?

TitleAssociations between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life among young adults: Does it depend on how you assess them?
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
Citation
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2011, v. 39 n. 2, p. 137-144 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To determine the association between orthodontic treatment need (OTN) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 273 young adults seeking orthodontic care. OHRQoL was assessed by the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and United Kingdom oral health-related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK). Study casts were assessed for OTN by: Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC) and Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC) and Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). Variations in OHIP-14 and OHQoL-UK were determined with respect to OTN, and the magnitude of differences was calculated (effect size: ES). Results: There were significant but weak correlations between occlusal indices scores and OHIP-14 scores (P < 0.05, r < 0.3) and between occlusal indices scores and OHQoL-UK scores (P < 0.05, r < 0.4). The magnitude of the statistical difference in OHQoL-UK scores was moderate to large with respect to OTN (ES: 0.36-0.87) and largest when DHC (ES = 0.87) and ICON (ES = 0.74) were used. The magnitude of the statistical difference in OHIP-14 scores was relatively lower (ES: 0.21-0.69), but also greatest when DHC and ICON were used to determine OTN (ES 0.69 and 0.50, respectively). Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment need was associated with OHRQoL. The magnitude of the statistical difference between those with and without an orthodontic treatment need was larger when OHRQoL was assessed using OHQoL-UK compared to OHIP-14. DHC and ICON were more useful indices in identifying greater differences in OHRQoL with respect to orthodontic treatment need. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154660
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.233
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcgrath, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHägg, Uen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:46Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2011, v. 39 n. 2, p. 137-144en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154660-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the association between orthodontic treatment need (OTN) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 273 young adults seeking orthodontic care. OHRQoL was assessed by the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and United Kingdom oral health-related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK). Study casts were assessed for OTN by: Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC) and Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC) and Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). Variations in OHIP-14 and OHQoL-UK were determined with respect to OTN, and the magnitude of differences was calculated (effect size: ES). Results: There were significant but weak correlations between occlusal indices scores and OHIP-14 scores (P < 0.05, r < 0.3) and between occlusal indices scores and OHQoL-UK scores (P < 0.05, r < 0.4). The magnitude of the statistical difference in OHQoL-UK scores was moderate to large with respect to OTN (ES: 0.36-0.87) and largest when DHC (ES = 0.87) and ICON (ES = 0.74) were used. The magnitude of the statistical difference in OHIP-14 scores was relatively lower (ES: 0.21-0.69), but also greatest when DHC and ICON were used to determine OTN (ES 0.69 and 0.50, respectively). Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment need was associated with OHRQoL. The magnitude of the statistical difference between those with and without an orthodontic treatment need was larger when OHRQoL was assessed using OHQoL-UK compared to OHIP-14. DHC and ICON were more useful indices in identifying greater differences in OHRQoL with respect to orthodontic treatment need. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COMen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Health Surveysen_US
dc.subject.meshEsthetics, Dental - Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMalocclusion - Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshNeeds Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.meshOral Healthen_US
dc.subject.meshOrthodontics - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshQuality Of Life - Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.meshYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleAssociations between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life among young adults: Does it depend on how you assess them?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C:mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailHägg, U:euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_US
dc.identifier.authorityHägg, U=rp00020en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00573.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21210961en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952477824en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros184680-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952477824&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage137en_US
dc.identifier.epage144en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288077100004-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLiu, Z=35215313800en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHägg, U=7006790279en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats