File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-78650192193
- PMID: 21091792
- WOS: WOS:000285390700003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: A randomized-controlled clinical trial
Title | The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: A randomized-controlled clinical trial | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||
Keywords | Clinical outcomes Dental implants Marginal bone levels Randomized-controlled clinical trial Standard Plus ® implants | ||||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||||
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||||
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 1, p. 14-19 How to Cite? | ||||||
Abstract | Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue-level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading. Material and methods: Eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri-apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type-evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading. Results: The mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1-2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading. Conclusion: Implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | ||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154648 | ||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 | ||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: The authors would like to express their special thanks to Drs Andrea Albert Kiszely, Suprenee Benjasupattananan, Caroline Fischer, Stefan Imwinkelried, Michael Krahenmann, Mette Rylev Agerbaek and Anita Wehrle Fuchs for their clinical work, which contributed to this study. This study was supported by the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz BE, Switzerland. W. C. Tan was an ITI Scholar for the year 2006/2007 (ITI Foundation educational grant). | ||||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tan, WC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidlin, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zwahlen, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pjetursson, BE | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:26:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:26:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2011, v. 22 n. 1, p. 14-19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154648 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the soft and hard tissue healing and remodeling around tissue-level implants with different neck configurations after at least 1 year of functional loading. Material and methods: Eighteen patients with multiple missing teeth in the posterior area received two implants inserted in the same sextant. One test (T) implant with a 1.8 mm turned neck and one control (C) implant with a 2.8 mm turned neck were randomly assigned. All implants were placed transmucosally to the same sink depth of approximately 1.8 mm. Peri-apical radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators blinded to the implant type-evaluated soft and hard tissue conditions at baseline, 6 months and 1 year after loading. Results: The mean crestal bone levels and soft tissue parameters were not significantly different between T and C implants at all time points. However, T implants displayed significantly less crestal bone loss than C implants after 1 year. Moreover, a frequency analysis revealed a higher percentage (50%) of T implants with crestal bone levels 1-2 mm below the implant shoulder compared with C implants (5.6%) 1 year after loading. Conclusion: Implants with a reduced height turned neck of 1.8 mm may, indeed, lower the crestal bone resorption and hence, may maintain higher crestal bone levels than do implants with a 2.8 mm turned neck, when sunk to the same depth. Moreover, several factors other than the vertical positioning of the moderately rough SLA surface may influence crestal bone levels after 1 year of function. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical outcomes | - |
dc.subject | Dental implants | - |
dc.subject | Marginal bone levels | - |
dc.subject | Randomized-controlled clinical trial | - |
dc.subject | Standard Plus ® implants | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Bone Loss - Etiology - Prevention & Control - Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Density | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Chi-Square Distribution | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implantation, Endosseous - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis Design | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Peri-Implantitis - Prevention & Control | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prosthesis-Related Infections - Prevention & Control | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Statistics, Nonparametric | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Wound Healing | en_US |
dc.title | The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: A randomized-controlled clinical trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21091792 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-78650192193 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650192193&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 14 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 19 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000285390700003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tan, WC=15052310400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Schmidlin, K=24476651100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zwahlen, M=7004748418 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pjetursson, BE=6506841442 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |