File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Flap vs. "flapless" surgical approach at immediate implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs

TitleFlap vs. "flapless" surgical approach at immediate implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 12, p. 1314-1319 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To compare the remodeling of the alveolar process at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets by applying a flap or a "flapless" surgical approach in a dog model.Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into the distal alveoli of the second mandibular premolars of six Labrador dogs. In one side of the mandible, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated (control site), while contra-laterally, the mucosa was gently dislocated, but not elevated (test site) to disclose the alveolar crest. After 4 months of healing, the animals were sacrificed, ground sections were obtained and a histomorphometric analysis was performed.Results: After 4 months of healing, all implants were integrated (n=6). Both at the test and at the control sites, bone resorption occurred with similar outcomes. The buccal bony crest resorption was 1.7 and 1.5 mm at the control and the test sites, respectively.Conclusions: "Flapless" implant placement into extraction sockets did not result in the prevention of alveolar bone resorption and did not affect the dimensional changes of the alveolar process following tooth extraction when compared with the usual placement of implants raising mucoperiosteal flaps. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154641
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant of Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy, and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. The competent contributions of Mr Sebastiao Bianco, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil, in the histological processing are highly appreciated.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaneva, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorSalata, LAen_US
dc.contributor.authorSouza, SLSen_US
dc.contributor.authorBressan, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:39Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 12, p. 1314-1319en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154641-
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the remodeling of the alveolar process at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets by applying a flap or a "flapless" surgical approach in a dog model.Material and methods: Implants were installed immediately into the distal alveoli of the second mandibular premolars of six Labrador dogs. In one side of the mandible, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated (control site), while contra-laterally, the mucosa was gently dislocated, but not elevated (test site) to disclose the alveolar crest. After 4 months of healing, the animals were sacrificed, ground sections were obtained and a histomorphometric analysis was performed.Results: After 4 months of healing, all implants were integrated (n=6). Both at the test and at the control sites, bone resorption occurred with similar outcomes. The buccal bony crest resorption was 1.7 and 1.5 mm at the control and the test sites, respectively.Conclusions: "Flapless" implant placement into extraction sockets did not result in the prevention of alveolar bone resorption and did not affect the dimensional changes of the alveolar process following tooth extraction when compared with the usual placement of implants raising mucoperiosteal flaps. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshConnective Tissue - Anatomy & Histologyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Abutmentsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshDogsen_US
dc.subject.meshEpithelial Attachment - Anatomy & Histologyen_US
dc.subject.meshGingiva - Anatomy & Histologyen_US
dc.subject.meshPhotomicrographyen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgical Flapsen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - Surgeryen_US
dc.titleFlap vs. "flapless" surgical approach at immediate implants: A histomorphometric study in dogsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01959.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20637034-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78349291929en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78349291929&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.spage1314en_US
dc.identifier.epage1319en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000284120200002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCaneva, M=35247602500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBotticelli, D=6601962395en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSalata, LA=6603503456en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSouza, SLS=35512679900en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBressan, E=6506334771en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats