File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements

TitleComparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdent
Citation
Journal Of Dentistry, 2010, v. 38 n. 10, p. 820-827 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To measure the shear punch strength of eight resin-containing luting cements before and after immersion in acidic solution and ethanol at different temperatures (37° C and 60 °C). Method: Specimens were prepared from six resin luting cements; Set (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX Veneer (3M/ESPE), VarioloinkII (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two Resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). For each material a total of 114 disc-shaped specimens were prepared. Six specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C, polished and subjected to baseline measurement for shear punch strength. The remaining 108 specimens were randomly divided into 18 groups of six, and immersed in three solutions; distilled water, 0.01 mol/L lactic acid, and 50% ethanol at 37 °C or 60 °C, for 1 week, 1 month or 3 months. Specimens were washed, dried and tested for final shear punch strength. Results: Values were material and solution dependent. Values of Nexus 2 and Rely X Veneer are the highest, and Rely X Luting 2 the lowest. Ethanol and lactic acid specimens showed significantly lower values compared with the distilled water specimens. Conclusion: The shear punch strengths of the resin-containing luting cements were affected by time and storage solution. While some of the resin luting cements had significantly higher values compared to that of the RM-GICs, there were no significant differences between the RM-GICs and resin cements such as Panavia F and Set. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154630
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.109
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.029
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Melbourne Dental School, the University of Melbourne
Dicle Universitesi Bilimsel Arastirma Projeleri Koordinatorlugu-Diyarbakir/TURKEY (DUBAP)
Funding Information:

This study was supported in part by and conducted in the Melbourne Dental School, the University of Melbourne. Dr Mese was supported by a grant from Dicle Universitesi Bilimsel Arastirma Projeleri Koordinatorlugu-Diyarbakir/TURKEY (DUBAP).

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBagheri, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorMese, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTyas, MJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Dentistry, 2010, v. 38 n. 10, p. 820-827en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154630-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To measure the shear punch strength of eight resin-containing luting cements before and after immersion in acidic solution and ethanol at different temperatures (37° C and 60 °C). Method: Specimens were prepared from six resin luting cements; Set (SDI), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX Veneer (3M/ESPE), VarioloinkII (Ivoclar), Maxcem (Kerr), Nexus2 (Kerr) and two Resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements (RM-GICs); GC Fuji Plus (GC Corporation), RelyX Luting 2 (3 M/ESPE). For each material a total of 114 disc-shaped specimens were prepared. Six specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C, polished and subjected to baseline measurement for shear punch strength. The remaining 108 specimens were randomly divided into 18 groups of six, and immersed in three solutions; distilled water, 0.01 mol/L lactic acid, and 50% ethanol at 37 °C or 60 °C, for 1 week, 1 month or 3 months. Specimens were washed, dried and tested for final shear punch strength. Results: Values were material and solution dependent. Values of Nexus 2 and Rely X Veneer are the highest, and Rely X Luting 2 the lowest. Ethanol and lactic acid specimens showed significantly lower values compared with the distilled water specimens. Conclusion: The shear punch strengths of the resin-containing luting cements were affected by time and storage solution. While some of the resin luting cements had significantly higher values compared to that of the RM-GICs, there were no significant differences between the RM-GICs and resin cements such as Panavia F and Set. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdenten_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Polishing - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDrug Storageen_US
dc.subject.meshEthanol - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cements - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshImmersionen_US
dc.subject.meshLactic Acid - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_US
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshPolyurethanes - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshShear Strengthen_US
dc.subject.meshSolvents - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshStress, Mechanicalen_US
dc.subject.meshTemperatureen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.subject.meshWater - Chemistryen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.014en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20600555-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77956056287en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros184685-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956056287&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.spage820en_US
dc.identifier.epage827en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000282116800008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBagheri, R=8635819700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMese, A=16031442300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyas, MJ=7006088443en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike7477694-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats