File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications

TitleBilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom
Citation
International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 39 n. 8, p. 756-760 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to conduct a prospective clinical trial comparing the neurosensory function of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after mandibular advancement surgery with either bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) or mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO). 23 Class II mandibular hypoplasia patients requiring mandibular advancement were randomized into two groups for either BSSO or MDO. Subjective and objective neurosensory evaluations were performed preoperatively and at the following postoperative times: 2 weeks (TBD1), 6 weeks (TBD2), 12 weeks (TBD3), 6 months (TBD4) and 12 months (TBD5). Subjective evaluation included the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Objective evaluation included the use of light touch (LT), two-point discrimination (2PD) and pain detection threshold (PD) tests. Intra-operative or postoperative complications were recorded. Using a mixed model, no significant differences were reported in subjective VAS scores and objective LT, 2PD and PD scores between the BSSO and MDO groups over 12 months (p > 0.05). Common postoperative complications included localized wound infection (BSSO = 2, MDO = 6) and condylar resorption (BSSO = 1, MDO = 1). © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154629
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.563
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.854
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOw, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2010, v. 39 n. 8, p. 756-760en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154629-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to conduct a prospective clinical trial comparing the neurosensory function of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after mandibular advancement surgery with either bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) or mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO). 23 Class II mandibular hypoplasia patients requiring mandibular advancement were randomized into two groups for either BSSO or MDO. Subjective and objective neurosensory evaluations were performed preoperatively and at the following postoperative times: 2 weeks (TBD1), 6 weeks (TBD2), 12 weeks (TBD3), 6 months (TBD4) and 12 months (TBD5). Subjective evaluation included the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Objective evaluation included the use of light touch (LT), two-point discrimination (2PD) and pain detection threshold (PD) tests. Intra-operative or postoperative complications were recorded. Using a mixed model, no significant differences were reported in subjective VAS scores and objective LT, 2PD and PD scores between the BSSO and MDO groups over 12 months (p > 0.05). Common postoperative complications included localized wound infection (BSSO = 2, MDO = 6) and condylar resorption (BSSO = 1, MDO = 1). © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshCranial Nerve Injuries - Etiology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshDiscrimination (Psychology) - Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMalocclusion, Angle Class Ii - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMandible - Innervation - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMandibular Advancement - Adverse Effects - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshOrthognathic Surgical Procedures - Adverse Effects - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesis, Distraction - Adverse Effects - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - Adverse Effects - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshPain Threshold - Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrognathism - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshTouch - Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subject.meshTrigeminal Nerve Injuriesen_US
dc.subject.meshYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleBilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK:lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.001en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20452186-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77955926534en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955926534&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.spage756en_US
dc.identifier.epage760en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000281596200002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOw, A=23973480300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats