File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleA 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients
 
AuthorsMatarasso, S1
Rasperini, G4
Iorio Siciliano, V1
Salvi, GE3
Lang, NP2
Aglietta, M3
 
Issue Date2010
 
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 898-903 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01945.x
 
AbstractAim: To compare the 10-year peri-implant bone loss (BL) rate in periodontally compromised (PCP) and periodontally healthy patients (PHP) around two different implant systems supporting single-unit crowns. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, controlled study, the mean BL (mBL) rate around dental implants placed in four groups of 20 non-smokers was evaluated after a follow-up of 10 years. Two groups of patients treated for periodontitis (PCP) and two groups of PHP were created. For each category (PCP and PHP), two different types of implant had been selected. The mBL was calculated by subtracting the radiographic bone levels at the time of crown cementation from the bone levels at the 10-year follow-up. Results: The mean age, mean full-mouth plaque and full-mouth bleeding scores and implant location were similar between the four groups. Implant survival rates ranged between 85% and 95%, without statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between groups. For both implant systems, PCP showed statistically significantly higher mBL rates and number of sites with BL≥3 mm compared with PHP (P<0.0001). Conclusions: After 10 years, implants in PCP yielded lower survival rates and higher mean marginal BL rates compared with those of implants placed in PHP. These results were independent of the implant system used or the healing modality applied. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
ISSN0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01945.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000280630200003
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Department of Periodontology, University of Naples, Italy
Italian Society of Periodontology
ITI scholarship
Funding Information:

The authors thank Dr Andrea Blasi, Naples, Italy, for the statistical analysis. The competent assistance of the staff at the Department of Periodontology at the University Federico II, Naples, Italy, is highly appreciated. This study was supported by departmental funds of the Department of Periodontology, University of Naples, Italy, and of the private practice of Dr Giulio Rasperini, Piacenza, Italy. The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study. The corresponding author (M.A.) was supported by a scholarship of the Italian Society of Periodontology 2006-2008 and an ITI scholarship in 2008/2009.

 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorMatarasso, S
 
dc.contributor.authorRasperini, G
 
dc.contributor.authorIorio Siciliano, V
 
dc.contributor.authorSalvi, GE
 
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
 
dc.contributor.authorAglietta, M
 
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:34Z
 
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:34Z
 
dc.date.issued2010
 
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the 10-year peri-implant bone loss (BL) rate in periodontally compromised (PCP) and periodontally healthy patients (PHP) around two different implant systems supporting single-unit crowns. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, controlled study, the mean BL (mBL) rate around dental implants placed in four groups of 20 non-smokers was evaluated after a follow-up of 10 years. Two groups of patients treated for periodontitis (PCP) and two groups of PHP were created. For each category (PCP and PHP), two different types of implant had been selected. The mBL was calculated by subtracting the radiographic bone levels at the time of crown cementation from the bone levels at the 10-year follow-up. Results: The mean age, mean full-mouth plaque and full-mouth bleeding scores and implant location were similar between the four groups. Implant survival rates ranged between 85% and 95%, without statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between groups. For both implant systems, PCP showed statistically significantly higher mBL rates and number of sites with BL≥3 mm compared with PHP (P<0.0001). Conclusions: After 10 years, implants in PCP yielded lower survival rates and higher mean marginal BL rates compared with those of implants placed in PHP. These results were independent of the implant system used or the healing modality applied. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
 
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 898-903 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01945.x
 
dc.identifier.citeulike7604538
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01945.x
 
dc.identifier.epage903
 
dc.identifier.hkuros182855
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000280630200003
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Department of Periodontology, University of Naples, Italy
Italian Society of Periodontology
ITI scholarship
Funding Information:

The authors thank Dr Andrea Blasi, Naples, Italy, for the statistical analysis. The competent assistance of the staff at the Department of Periodontology at the University Federico II, Naples, Italy, is highly appreciated. This study was supported by departmental funds of the Department of Periodontology, University of Naples, Italy, and of the private practice of Dr Giulio Rasperini, Piacenza, Italy. The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study. The corresponding author (M.A.) was supported by a scholarship of the Italian Society of Periodontology 2006-2008 and an ITI scholarship in 2008/2009.

 
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
dc.identifier.issue9
 
dc.identifier.pmid20438576
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77955379913
 
dc.identifier.spage898
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154626
 
dc.identifier.volume21
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
 
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.subject.meshAge Factors
 
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - Radiography
 
dc.subject.meshCementation
 
dc.subject.meshCoated Materials, Biocompatible - Chemistry
 
dc.subject.meshCrowns
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Tooth
 
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - Chemistry
 
dc.subject.meshDental Plaque Index
 
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Design
 
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
 
dc.subject.meshFemale
 
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
 
dc.subject.meshHumans
 
dc.subject.meshMale
 
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
 
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Index
 
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket - Therapy
 
dc.subject.meshPeriodontitis - Therapy
 
dc.subject.meshPlasma Gases - Chemistry
 
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Dental, Digital
 
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
 
dc.subject.meshSurface Properties
 
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis
 
dc.subject.meshTitanium - Chemistry
 
dc.titleA 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Matarasso, S</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Rasperini, G</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Iorio Siciliano, V</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Salvi, GE</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Lang, NP</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Aglietta, M</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2012-08-08T08:26:34Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2012-08-08T08:26:34Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2010</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 9, p. 898-903</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>0905-7161</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154626</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>Aim: To compare the 10-year peri-implant bone loss (BL) rate in periodontally compromised (PCP) and periodontally healthy patients (PHP) around two different implant systems supporting single-unit crowns. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, controlled study, the mean BL (mBL) rate around dental implants placed in four groups of 20 non-smokers was evaluated after a follow-up of 10 years. Two groups of patients treated for periodontitis (PCP) and two groups of PHP were created. For each category (PCP and PHP), two different types of implant had been selected. The mBL was calculated by subtracting the radiographic bone levels at the time of crown cementation from the bone levels at the 10-year follow-up. Results: The mean age, mean full-mouth plaque and full-mouth bleeding scores and implant location were similar between the four groups. Implant survival rates ranged between 85% and 95%, without statistically significant differences (P&gt;0.05) between groups. For both implant systems, PCP showed statistically significantly higher mBL rates and number of sites with BL&#8805;3 mm compared with PHP (P&lt;0.0001). Conclusions: After 10 years, implants in PCP yielded lower survival rates and higher mean marginal BL rates compared with those of implants placed in PHP. These results were independent of the implant system used or the healing modality applied. &#169; 2010 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Clinical Oral Implants Research</relation.ispartof>
<subject.mesh>Age Factors</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Alveolar Bone Loss - Radiography</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Cementation</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - Chemistry</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Crowns</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Materials - Chemistry</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Plaque Index</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Female</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Follow-Up Studies</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Humans</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Male</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Middle Aged</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Periodontal Index</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Periodontal Pocket - Therapy</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Periodontitis - Therapy</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Plasma Gases - Chemistry</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Radiography, Dental, Digital</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Retrospective Studies</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Surface Properties</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Survival Analysis</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Titanium - Chemistry</subject.mesh>
<title>A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients</title>
<type>Article</type>
<description.nature>Link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01945.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>20438576</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-77955379913</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>182855</identifier.hkuros>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955379913&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>21</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>9</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>898</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>903</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000280630200003</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United States</publisher.place>
<identifier.citeulike>7604538</identifier.citeulike>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  2. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  3. Universität Bern
  4. Università degli Studi di Milano